Fortigate phase 2 not coming up 83) FortiGate B. The partner is using a Cisco ASA. The Fortigate seems to be fine as it is showing the tunnel status as UP. Issues with Site to Site IPSec VPN Not coming back up . I’ve found that in the existing fortigate-fortigate VPNs, the subnets listed in the phase 2 settings are simply 0. What a waste of 3 days. 5. 4. FortiGate v5. i can see packets are encapsulating from remote site and decapsulating in HO,But opposit side not happening(ie no encapsulation in HO end & no decapsulation in remote site end). In the example above the first Phase 2 selector and the third one have the same remote and local subnet. I am on fortios 7. Regards Nagaraju. It may help to eliminate the 2nd phase 2 selector and additional (unneeded) encryption / authentication protocols. 8 on the loopback. 0 and the Phase1 tunnels (Underlays) are coming up without issue. It just would be sort of nice to see that the Phase2 "Mirth_Test" interface is up rather than just seeing "MetropolisIndia_1" is up. Scope: IPSec VPN Site-to-Site Fortigate to Palo Alto. In this output, we do not see a specific PFS error, but normally in Phase II these are the following situations you will find: Hi, We are currently trying to establish a site to site VPN with a partner. FortiGate A (10. This article applies to all the possible scenarios mentioned below: FortiGate=====IPSec Tunnel=====FortiGate; FortiGateVM=====IPSec Tunnel====FortiGate; FortiGate=====IPSec Tunnel=====Third Party Yeah, I thought about doing exactly that, but then there is the risk of the VPN not coming back up for whatever stupid reason. Step 1: What type of tunnel have issues? Site-to-Site VPN. Dial-Up VPN . Scope: FortiOS. Also, in Sonicwall, if I had 5 networks configured in phase 2 and the other side had 4, it would bring up the 4 and I could see which one was down. Maybe someone could help me out :) I have IPSec is running between two locations A-B. But when I try to bring up phase 2 selectors, it pretty much does nothing but keep successfully negotiating phase 1. 5 fg60poe. 15. Configure ike v2 on Fortigate instead of ike v1 You need to make sure that the configuration is exactly the same for the vpn to come up. Cisco ASA shows Phase 1 is completed then keeps trying for Phase 2 but This article describes how to handle a scenario where the IPsec Tunnel is up and traffic seems to be leaving FortiGate but is not reaching the remote end. Good Afternoon, I am trying to bring up a site to site vpn between a Cisco device and a Fortigate 60D 5. S I have access only to my side of tunnel. Post Reply Announcements. x/28 and y. I can create tunnels to Azure and to a spare WAN connection in Had to reboot our core router for a different issue. However, there is only 4/10 Phase 2 Selectors can UP at the same time on the FG100D. 8)----IPSec_Tunnel----(10. To do so, issue the command: diagnose vpn tunnel list name <phase1-name> Technical Tip: FortiGate Hub with multiple IPSec Source is a Fortigate 60E with a Frontier DSL connection using PPPoE on WAN1 with a static IP (note, I am not using the unnumbered IP to set the static, that would not work for some reason) Destination is a Cisco ASA on a Static IP. Hi all, got configured IPSec tunnel it is up (phase 1 and 2) but no Outgoing Data. Solution: In the output of FortiGate debugging, the following can be observed: <- FortiGate responds (with no complaints logged in the debugs)-> client sends an informational message back (not normal) <- FortiGate tries to retransmit its first reply two more times, then gives up The client most likely doesn't like something, and probably tries to say as much in the informational message. Good day to everyone! I am new to Fortinet Equipment, The company i just started for has FortiWifi 50E's and i'm trying to move there VPN setup over from route though their old IT persons house to a Azure VPN setup and that was going good till i did a reboot from adding this new tunnel in Need to see the two ID fields decoded in QM packet 1 when the Check Point is the initiator. When Ping from computer with vlan10 I see deny and hit policy 0 in FAZ. The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. Browse Fortinet Community. This articles describes a solution for an issue with IPSEC phase2 observed between FortiGate and Palo Alto. 10, and each time it was solved by “set npu-offload disable Reply reply Ive configured ADVPN according to the SD-WAN study guide for FortiOS 7. It appears the phase 1 (IKE) is coming up and the issue is with the phase 2 (IPSEC) negotiation. 7188 0 Kudos Reply. There should be 2 rules for each VPN on each Firewall. However for some reason, the network of one of them keeps getting the phase 2 status "down" and the connection is lost. Tried comparing everything on both sides but not able to see why it is failing. Here' s the logs from the fortigate: In Phase 2 selectors, instead of having one remote network, I used a named adress which consists of two different networks x. 4582 0 Kudos Reply. y/28, which represents the networks of our customers/clients. 10404 The VPN both phases are coming up ,but iam not able to achieve my connectivity. I ran a debug diag debug app ike -1 giving the following output: From the output it seems that "Network is unreachable" the Fortigate is unable to route to the overlay. Joseph-M. The only thing I saw odd in the debug is that you appear to have two phase 2 selectors however the remote only has one. At the conclusion of phase 2 each peer will be ready to pass data plane traffic Remove any Phase 1 or Phase 2 configurations that are not in use. I'm trying to set up a dialup IPsec tunnel within an existing IPsec tunnel on FortiGates, using the following topology. Hello, We have a site-site IPSEC tunnel between Fortigate and Cisco. 0. All of the settings like encryption, key life etc are on both sides the same What happens is that after a while there is no traffic possi The basic phase 2 settings associate IPsec phase 2 parameters with the phase 1 configuration that specifies the remote end point of the VPN tunnel. Trying to bring up an IPSEC tunnel. If you want to get really crazy you could create an automation stitch to send a trigger which can be processed by another box which can then make API calls to reset the tunnel Nested IPsec tunnels not coming up . 2 24 Yeah, I thought about doing exactly that, but then there is the risk of the VPN not coming back up for whatever stupid reason. The basic phase 2 settings associate IPsec phase 2 parameters with the phase 1 configuration that specifies the remote end point of the VPN tunnel. New Contributor III. Scenario: IPSec tunnel between FortiGate A and FortiGate B. I think the phase 1 is ok, the problem is with phase2. Is is possible that when my part of the tunnel is configured ok, policy and route also but on the other side of the tunnel something is missing tunnel will show up on 2 phases but will send no data to the tunnel? The phase 2 selector for 10. 0 from 6. Fortinet Community; Support Forum; Phase 2 Selectors static route, ike, encryption and DS groups on both FG devices. Fortigate Debug Command. The connection is OK. I've tried creating a 2nd IPSec tunnel but it isn't connecting. Here we can see that Quick-Mode has failed. 11 ) All our IPSEC tunnels are down and. This shows us Phase I is up. Question but I was able to get it working by having the HQ FortiGate's subsidiary VDOM be the dialup initiator instead of the usual other way around. 0/16 phase 2 selector uses AES256 and SHA384 In theory there is also the benefit that the lower encryption level requires less processing, although in practice if you are relying on reducing the encryption on some of your VPN tunnels to get better overall In my Sonicwall, for Phase 2, I could see each phase 2 tunnel per site. It can be Authentication(not the same pre-shared key) /Phase1(Algo,DH Groups)/Phase2 misconfiguration. 9 and 6. Yes I have the following issue I am trying to solve: setup a static site2site VPN tunnel between a Fortigate 100E (local) and a Cisco ASA (remote). This does not work with meraki - you need to specifically name the subnets to be accessed in the meraki and the fortigate. Phase 2 selectors are the same and do connect properly. So it's a little bit of an "if it's not broke, don't fix it". 9 then 6. On FortiGate B, someone mistakenly defined the WAN IP address of the peer that is FortiGate A on the firewall either as VIP or IP Pool or IP address on the interface. (tunnel showing up, traffic seemingly passing but not returning) with 60Fs on both 6. As soon as it came online, boom, tunnel goes up. Phase II – IKE phase 2 establishes IPSec SAs (one in each direction) for the VPN connection, and is referred to as Quick Mode. Solution: After upgrading one side of the VPN peer Instead of restarting the Gates, try restarting the IPsec tunnel by going to Dashboard>Network>IPsec and bring down all Phase 2. Whatever is there does not match the Palo Alto which uses a universal tunnel (double 0. Yeah, I thought about doing exactly that, but then there is the risk of the VPN not coming back up for whatever stupid reason. y. After the above commands in fortigate cli please try to bring up the tunnel from ipsec monitor. Some settings can be configured in the CLI. In most cases, you need to configure only basic Phase 2 settings. 0/22 has Enc: AES128 and Auth: SHA256 and 10. On the Fortigate, it seems that phase 2 is either up or down. Please confirm the proxy id on the Juniper device as it needs to be the same on both the sides. Check the settings, including encapsulation setting, which must be I am trying to get an IPSEC Tunnel up and running and phase1 says it negotiate success according to the logs, then Phase2 never attempts. The following options are available in the VPN Creation Wizard after the tunnel is created: In Phase 2 selectors, instead of having one remote network, I used a named adress which consists of two different networks x. 9. If I bring UP another Phase, then 1 of the 4 Phase 2 checks: If the status of Phase 1 is in an established state, then focus on Phase 2. If several phase 2s are configured for phase1, only a few stay up. Use the following steps to assist with resolving a VPN tunnel that is not active or passing traffic. But on Cisco it is unable to bring up the tunnel as Phase 2 is failing. 7 (with optional upgrade path 6. The phase1 gets torn down and starts all over again. 10. One for each used range of my network. Scope. P. All messages in phase 2 are secured using the ISAKMP SA established in phase 1. The following options are available in the VPN Creation Wizard after the tunnel is created: Odd problem that support could not help me with. The problem is that the inner The basic phase 2 settings associate IPsec phase 2 parameters with the phase 1 configuration that specifies the remote end point of the VPN tunnel. 0/0. The only difference is that the SonicWall has two connections from my IP address to theirs. That's the only thing that I can figure that is different. EAP setting, which is disabled on the FortiGate side by default, EAP can be checked via the command: show full IPsec tunnel does not come up. Phase1 is coming up fine, but phase 2 is not establishing and giving me the error: ike 0:vpn2mpls:32522: notify msg received: NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN ike 0:vpn2mpls:32522:vpn2mpls:22985: IPsec SPI 2230d800 match ike Hi guys, I have a strange problem with an IPsec between two Fortigates. It just would be sort of nice to see that the Phase2 "Mirth_Test" interface is up What is the best practice to check why traffic is not hitting this tunnel or policy? P. FortiGate. Do you have blackhole routes setup on both sides? Ran into similar issues, and flapping the port I created a VPN with 10 Phase 2 Selectors between an FG200E and FG100D. Solution. x. Diag Commands. 0/0's) by default, but the Palo can be configured to mimic a domain-based VPN via the configuration of Proxy-IDs. Policy from Zone (with vlan10 in it) to VPN tunnel configured, Static Route (with subnet I try to reach, and VPN interface configured) also. I guess this is the luxury of using the same brand firewall at each end of the connection. The phase 2 tunnels are not. This article describes how to troubleshoot a case where phase2 failed to come up after a FortiOS upgrade. The following options are available in the VPN Creation Wizard after the tunnel is created: Generally NO SUITABLE IKE_SA means that the 2 Gates IPsec config (Phase 1 & 2) are not the same and hence can`t establish the tunnel. S II. Solved: After upgrading our FortiGate to v7. Configuration of phase1 and Disable PFS in phase 2 on both sides to check the issue. restart phase-2 restart phase-1 and phase-2 Also double check the rules on the fortigate. Wh When checked under references for this IPSec tunnel, the concerned Phase 2 selector shows up, but that Phase 2 selector is slightly towards right-hand side: If that is the case, then that Phase 2 selector is repetitive. Step 2: Is Phase-2 Status 'UP'? No (SA=0) - Continue to Step 3. In Phase 2 selectors, instead of having one remote network, I used a named adress which consists of two different networks x. Check the logs to determine whether the failure is in Phase 1 or Phase 2. Do you have Dead-Peer Detection configured inside of Phase-1 on the FortiGate? If not, try turning that on to "On-Demand" which may help recover the session. In this example, IP address 10. If a duplicate instance of the VPN tunnel appears on the IPsec Monitor, reboot your FortiGate unit to try and clear the entry. He sent us the configuration parameters which we configured, but the VPN tunnel is still not coming up. ioda njefb rbwggu bgk nxsx owvqi kjdj fmaxhsc hxaebwf jrifucpjp