Polk r200 vs revel m16 vs m16 sound quality forum If the M16's are cheaper, I see zero reason not to purchase them. Scroll down to the comparison section of the review an important contributor to overall sound quality, providing consistent sound over an exceptionally wide listening area. Dyn EmitM10. I have polk r700 r400. Our primary goal is insightful discussion of home audio equipment, sources, music, and concepts. Pair of 1985 Polk Audio Monitor 7Cs - rebuilt crossover with Audyn Revel’s latest series revamp is the Concerta2—and it might be even more impressive. lineup. Both speakers are superb yet sound different enough. com/232puf4b🛒 Tonewinner AD-1PA Amp Klipsch vs. New to the forum. I could *maybe* hear the difference on tracks with a lot of hi-hat. Use would be a mix of music, gaming, and movies. Can this be better than the Polk R200? Can't decide between them. My subwoofer is SVS SB3000. It can easily fill up small to medium sized rooms when paired with an appropriate amp. Choosing Between the Revel M16 and Polk R200: A Complete Comparison. They Said R700 is better with bass in regards to port. I also own the 220's and love them as well. It can get quite loud without showing major distortion. How would the Polk R200 compare to these speakers? I see they also objectively perform very well on the bench and are quite a bit less expensive. Save Share Reply Quote Like. 5m OFHC continuous cast copper USB cable I always thank you for your support! and being with me. https://www. 0 black vinyl, but it was almost even worse with the wrap terminating in a visible seam on the bottom. sgtmick63 Posts: 166. Come join the The Polk ES10 is specifically designed for surround sound use, while the Revel M16 works best as front speakers in a home theater setup due to its larger size and better sound quality. Third song was a tiny preference for the Revel. So give or take there in reality, as that's probably the F3 roll off and anechoic. Wallet Burning Hobby. 5 inch 2 way speakers and not only are they very large but they sound great. . We happened to just start testing the M16 and the R200 the same week. Reactions: cocrh. I always thank you for your support! and being with me. The M16 are now my new reference, Revel Concerta2 M16 Bookshelf Speaker; They're designed to deliver high-quality sound while taking up minimal space. but i will miss the smooth 9. 2 The R200 is more in line with my expectations for sound quality per dollar spent. Sep 23, 2022 #742 I'm under the impression I'd have to spend well above $4,000 to make a worthy audio quality leap from this point. thanks [Sound Battle] KEF Q350 vs Polk Audio R200/ Audiolab 6000A The Polk XT15 is more compact, while the Revel M16 is larger but offers better sound quality. Joined Feb 2, 2021 Messages 160 Likes 143. Polk Audio Forum Polk R200, Klipsch RP600M, KEF Q150, JBL STUDIO 530, Wharfedale Diamond 11. I mean these two speakers –at least on paper –could be twins. Revel M16 vs. Are they a step up in quality from the Elac? These are the only ones that I can demo locally. REVEL VS POLK. Forum Donor. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison between the Polk R200 Thanks Aaron so much for your insights. It totally lacks clarity and texture. Eversolo DMP-A6 Masters Edition. The flat intrasecting edges where the vinyl was trimmed were plainly obvious. January 1 edited January 1 in Speakers. I am looking for an upgrade to my 5. Has anyone heard more than one of these? Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free! Forums. Some love ribbons, eventhough they can harmonicaly measure worse than domes. Thats for the Revel M16. I can easily recommend these. Simaudio Moon 680d DSD “When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing My 2c: KEF LS50 Meta as LCR is not the best choice if you have a room > 2000^3 and/or sit further than 2. Next Last. Polk vs Revel vs Kef - Polk sale throwing a wrench in my plans. 9, Revel M16 gets 5. The Revel M16's 6. The measurements show it as a very neutral sounding speaker. don't seem to be super high quality but I'm sure they don't detract from the sound quality. Asked why different woofer sizes and which has better bass response due to that and powerport. It’s just my humble opinion. Topping D30 | Parasound PL/D-1100 | Parasound HCA-1500a | Polk R200. Reactions: Acerun and tw 2022. I am planning to build up a 5. It has a solid build and amazing performance. speakers on my setup but was just scarred for life as I used an unbalanced Klipsch RP-600M Revel M16 JBL HDI-1600 I can get these at dealer pricing. The Reserve series, launched in 2021, represents Polk's latest technology I have polk r700 r400. I also noticed the top end improvement of the R200 over 703 with the new ring radiator tweeter in the former - the 703s can get a little edgy up top at times - but even so, still found myself preferring the 703 overall between it and the R200. The crossover on this one is at 3khz. Unfortunately very few of our current genre of acoustic tests have had this kind of introspection. 4 XT20 Let's compare the Polk R200 with the Polk S20, with the help of some sound demos. Pair of Polk m200 for $700, pair of emotiva t1+ (3 ways) for $900, pair of revel m16 for $1k, pair of (improved) klipsch rp600m ii, or on sale single revel m106 for $770. Take advantage of the Revel sale and get some F208s/F206s. Bayzed Posts: 1. Joined Oct 10, 2020 Messages 868 Likes 2,778. i'm of the opinion that diminishing returns hit hard above the level of the 530's and you really Polk r200 vs r100 Considering these speakers and was wondering if anyone could describe what the main differences are between the two. 8 XT30 center: US$200/ea Preference Score (according to Erin) is 3. The Revel M16 uses a 1-inch aluminum dome tweeter paired with what they call an "acoustic lens waveguide" - essentially a carefully shaped horn that controls how high frequencies spread into the room. New posts Search forums. December 2021 in Speakers. I've also tried: Klipsch RP600M (first version), KEF Q150, JBL STUDIO 530, Wharfdale Diamond 11. With my first AVR a Onkyo tx-nr6050 there was audible clipping, even at medium and low volumes. " I'm not sure there is really that much difference in sound quality between the two. Search. I have lusted for LS50's ever since Habit Forming. 4, Dayton Audio 10" sub, Kinter amp. Performa3 F206/Performa3 C208/Concerta2 S16/Concerta2 M16/Architectural C763L I TLDR: Contacted Polk on differences for why L600 is more than R700. Apr 22, 2022 #2 Close to the discounted M16 price or MSRP M16 price? B. The Polk R200 has solid bass along with good dynamics. redsled Posts: 21. I purchased a pair of BMRs for my office and sold my M106s. ELAC DBR62. I'd love to see a full spin on the larger Polks as the R100/200 do quite well and I love my R100 paired with sub. However, I have the ability to buy a used set of F208's for around $2250usd. a little disconected sounding with tweeter and woofer or maybe just not the highest resolution tweeter more warm sounding but very pleasant and smooth and punchy. I don't think the 906's have been reviewed yet, but the Ultra's and M16's are both about the same price and reviewed at 4. 25" driver gives it an advantage Polk R200 50th Anniversary Edition. Since then I switched my Revel into the garage and the Infinity to the desktop. polk audio sound quality competitor since 2005 MECA SQ Rookie of the Year 06 ~ MECA State Champ 06,07,08,11 ~ MECA World Finals 2nd place 06,07,08,09 08 Car Audio Nationals 1st ~ 07 N Georgia Nationals 1st ~ 06 Carl Casper Nationals 1st ~ USACi 05 Southeast AutumnFest 1st polk audio SR6500 --- polk audio MM1040 x2 -- Pioneer P99 -- Rockford I have the R200 and 5jr. 25" versions for $599. 1 Rooms: Samsung K8500 UBR player Svs Ultra Center, Svs sb 3000 Sub, Polk rtia3 surrounds, Bluesound Node N130 Streamer, Elac Vela fs409, Monitor I am building a system for a small living room (~200 sqft). I still have the M16 - they replaced our Polk LSi15 speakers in our living room rig, a significant improvement in sound quality, IMO. Polk R200 ($749) vs. Representing the company’s value line of loudspeakers, the collection includes a pair of towers, the F36 and F35, the C25 center, and the S16 surround alongside the sole stand-mounted compact, the $900-per-pair M16, the subject of this review. I am 90% music/10% movies. r/audiophile is a subreddit for the pursuit of quality audio reproduction of all forms, budgets, and sizes of speakers. Dedicated Forums for Subscribers and Patreons of ZeosPantera and Z Reviews. It's not at all what I would have expected:---The bigger R200 doesn't appear to have higher sensitivity or much more bass extension---The smaller midwoofer in the R100 seems to have *worse* directivity matching with the tweeter than the larger midwoofer in the R200 To me, the M106 are more airy and detailed (clarity) in the upper end, and have more texture in the mid-bass. I am able to crank up the Revel more in the garage/gym. , you don't have to watch his video if, like me, you'd rather read words. Revel C426. June 2022 in Speakers. If the M16 sounds as good as the M105, then Revel hasn’t done a good job with product differentiation. 2's I don't currently own them but I frequently say if you're looking for speakers up to the 2k price range you should compare them with the Revel M16 because I bet a good majority would be beaten by the Revel. 1 setup. George / NJ Polk 7B main speakers, std. A recent overhaul of the Concerta2 brings two towers, the F36 ($2,000/pair and recently reviewed by Tom Norton) and F35 ($1,600/pair), along with the M16 monitor ($900/pair), C25 center ($750), S16 on-wall ($900/pair), and B10 subwoofer ($1,500). New posts Search There is one Revel M16 pair for 700€ I would instantly get it but its on the other side of the country and do not think shipping is an option there. (which can be a bit fussy with placement and otherwise sound a bit lean). Focal Chora 806 for small room? High quality power is cheap these days, whether it be a Pro style amp with gain controls on the front, or say for example, a Yamaha integrated (may not have the audiophile 'charm' but technically I think most are fine and all of them would give far greater But must say last year my wife and I performed informal A/B test vs. 1 of 2 Go to page. I've seen the reviews here, and some of the discussions, but I haven't seen Reviews. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Polk R200 and Polk R600 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Heco Ambient 22F. It stays about the same from -15dB to 0dB. I am not sure how big a swing in sound quality the Revel M16 may provide as compared to the M106. For better imaging and soundstage these or Polk R200? Reviews. Revel M16 ($990 per pair): I step up in price. 2x SVS PB-2000 subs. I'm not sure there is really that much difference in sound quality between the two. OSD Black S80 & S81. Speakers: Revel F206 Salk Sound has both the chops for sound quality and (better than) furniture-grade Thanks to @hardisj for reviewing Polk Audio XT speakers. No mods to 5jr. Strongly recommend a pair of S16 for the surrounds. It is the perceived sound quality that Revel M16 Speaker Review. FWIIW I slightly prefer the less expensive Revel M16 to the R3, though I think I will do another fun comparison between them. Audioholics has some quasi-anechoic data on the Polk Other speakers are Infinity Reference RC263 center and Revel M16 surround. I have settled on getting the Lyngdorf TDAI-1120 amp. When it comes to high-quality bookshelf speakers under $1000, the Revel Concerta2 M16 and Polk Audio Reserve R200 represent two But must say last year my wife and I performed informal A/B test vs. Cinema 50 and Parasound A23+ for fronts. I especially like/agree with what you say here below with the comparison between the R200 and 703. The M16 does sound a bit more powerful but the 530 does well for a small driver. Small room, already have a bluesound powernode amp (2021 version). Please share your thoughts with me. My room is 12 x 15. i ended up keeping my emotiva b1+ for the higher res tweeter for 1/3 the price. Even though Polk calls both the R200, and the R700 as 8 Ohm speakers / It's my belief that they are both 4 Ohm speakers (I have to real experience with the R200 so it's conjecture for the R200 ). The transition from the tweeter to the woofer is seamless. This is a quasi-anechoic spinorama measurement of the Revel M16 passive bookshelf speaker. Running a Cambridge Audio CXA81 (80 w/channel), but have a Peachtree Nova 150 (150 w/channel) arriving tomorrow to really open these things up. I plan to run a phantom center, 4. This review brings together all but the towers and uses a pair of the on-walls as surround speakers. November 2023 in Speakers. They are great I'm looking at whether to consider replacing some Revel M16 speakers with M106. Purchasing CAN Hey guys, Was hoping to gather some opinions on which provides the best sound quality between the two without a sub (I am in a small apartment without room for one). My room is 23x12x8. You might (?!?) want to ask folks at the Polk forums, as well. 0 and this experience ran i got the R200 6. The Fora platform includes forum software by XenForo. This is reflected in their respective preference ratings derived using the Sean Olive formula, Monitor Audio Silver 100 gets 4. 5m and/or listen at or louder than around 85db, IMO. I am looking for a bedroom setup. Forums. From the tweeter crossover down, the two models should sound incredibly close. All measure well against Toole/Olive parameters except possibly the Focals. Needless to say, I am happy to recommend the Revel M16 speakers. Open topic discussions of anything media are Hey folks. The source is a Denon X3300W. A. they're both good, i actually think that if you aren't worried about having "the best" the 530's will serve well. It is what "high-end" sound reproduction is about in smaller budget. It is the perceived sound quality that matters not the measured quality – unless that measurement has been scaled and correlated to In this review, we will be comparing RTi A3 and M16, two Passive Bookshelf speakers from Polk Audio and Revel. It can clean and accurate mids. crutchfield. T. It's really splitting hairs. Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Office: Chane A 1. How do I compare the R200 vs the R100 for surround sound speakers? I have the R700 as mains. The crazy thing is that I have a set of the S1-V2's, and to me, sound-wise (I actually love the way they look) they are a toss up vs the M16's, and at least for me it seems the M16's are more forgiving of placement and easier to integrate with a sub. What I want to point out is that they sound fantastically different over the course of even just a few Has anyone heard both of these speakers. Then, you will notice, and measure if you desire, a difference. Speaker Decision. I like the sound now but don't like a slightly harsh feeling at loud volumes. Thx. Audio, Audio, Audio! Multiple Sources -> Denon AVR-X4800H w/ DLBC -> Peachtree Nova 300 -> Revel F206 + Revel C205 + Polk 65RT + Polk 70RT + SVS SB2000 = Damn. Marantz MM7025 stereo amp. The R200 weighs 19 lbs and the L200 weighs 22 lbs. Polk Audio Reserve R200 is a Bookshelf speaker whereas the R600 is a Floor-standing speaker. Multiple Sources -> Denon AVR-X4800H w/ DLBC -> Peachtree Nova 300 -> Revel F206 + Revel Polk Audio Reserve R200, $550; Polk Audio Legend L100, $599; Monitor Audio Studio Premium, $775; B&W 606 S2 (anniversary edition), $599; I'm also considering the Triangle Borea BR03s for $299. I have a pair of Conserta 2 M16 on order from Crutchfield and arrival date keeps getting pushed forward. I'll be sitting 12 ft away and mostly listening at low to medium volume. 0 · Share on Facebook Brian One-owner Polk Audio RTA 15TL speakers refreshed w/ Sonicap, anyone who's rolled capacitors will tell you there can be huge gains in sound quality with higher end crossover components. I wish I had the larger Wharfedale 12. Hypex amps. Having just bought the M106 speakers, moving those into the M16 space, and the moving M16 upstairs to replace the Polk LSi15, the sound from the Polk center was It is the perceived sound quality that matters not the measured quality – unless that measurement has been scaled and correlated to subjective perception through valid psychoacoustic tests. Plan to add a 2nd set of stand-mounts to my desktop setup. • audio·phile: a person with love for, affinity towards or obsession with high-quality playback of sound and music. My fronts are Polk RTIA5, Center is Polk CSIA6, My sides are Polk FXIA6. I recently purchased a Loxjie A30 and a pair of Polk XT20 speakers (both based off of reviews of this forum :)) but I'm not getting much success in producing anything but a strange clicking noise. 1, Revel M16, which I've returned. 2, Focal Chora 806/Aria 906 should all sound good. Come join the L/R Revel F206, Center Revel C208, Surrounds Revel M16's, Atmos Volt 6 (x4), Subs PSA TV2112 x 2, HoverEZe with 2 JBL GX1200. “M16 versus Polk R200, this one is close. 🛒 Polk R200 speakers - https://tinyurl. Denon X4300H, Emotiva XPA 5 for the bed layer, Vizio M70C3 display, Oppo 203 4K player. 9 Preference Score (according to Pierre) is 3. If you don't have a sub, the M106 will sound a bit thinner than the M16 in the low end. I suspect the BMRs provide a significant improvement in bass and many prefer the sound of the RAAL tweeter to the Revel dome (highly Not overthinking. Listen at approx. Hey folks. I bought Philharmonic BMR monitors over Revel M16 (and M105 / M106) a few years ago and am happy with the choice. In my subjective experience, it had a slightly warm sounding midrange but otherwise very neutral sound, very extended high Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free! Forums. Same woofer, same cabinet volume, minor update to the new 'Hexis' tweeter. I may try to get a listen sometime this week. 1/12. Hi everyone, I'm pretty new to all this so please forgive me if these questions sound idiotic. Audio, Audio, Audio! This is a review and detailed measurements of the Revel M16 stand-mount/bookshelf speaker. XT35 center: US$300/ea Preference Score (according to Erin) is 3. I was of the opinion that it was a defect in the Onkyo. I have read and digested most of the measurement threads and reviews on both speakers. The larger woofer size compared to the Polk's 5. But it's interesting to compare the R200 to his previous measurements of the R100. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. I am looking to get better performance for the music side. Perhaps due to Polk being a 3 way design but not sure. Does it necessarily mean R200 will provide better Revel's frequency specs for the S16 and M16 respectively are 70 Hz/53 Hz -3, 58 Hz/50 Hz -6, and 46 Hz/43 Hz -10 db, and having them on-wall seemingly provides great opportunity for boundary reinforcement near the crossover point. That does not mean you will nor does it mean the R200 is crap for you. Jun 15, 2020 #443 It is the perceived sound quality that matters not the measured quality – unless that measurement has been scaled and correlated to subjective perception through valid psychoacoustic tests. S. 4 | LCR Revel F36 x3 | FW Revel M16 x2 | S Revel S16 x4 | Atmos Revel C763L x4 | Sub PSA TV1813 x3 | Crowson x 4 - Living Room | LG 77" CX | Denon X4300H | HDHomeRun Quatro | Nvidia Shield Pro 2019 | ATV 4K 5. There are HT/multichannel folks there. Joined Feb 25, 2019 Messages 1,400 Likes 1,069 Location Texas Coastal. Different amps, source and placement. Don't know whether to start with something like the Triangle Bro2's or go with the Polk R200's (and anything in between). Focal seemed a bit too bright/thin. 1; 2; Next. Toggle navigation. Revel floor-standers are horribly inefficient speakers, requiring gobs of power. Lotsa graphs and spinorama stuff, which I know isn't a draw to many of the folks here, but there is a good ol' fashioned summary of his listening impressions of the R200 at the end (i. Polk r100 vs r200. 1" high and the L200 cabinet is 15. While I wish the M16 had some of Elac’s finish options, I prefer the M16’s sound. It should go well with the I had never heard of the Revel M16's. Deep Sea Sound Mariana 18S. Revel M16 Spinorama measurements (CTA-2034) Ageve; Nov 10, 2024; Speaker Reviews, Measurements and Discussion It is the perceived sound quality that matters not the measured quality – unless that measurement has been scaled and correlated to subjective perception through valid psychoacoustic tests. Will I notice a significant upgrade in sound quality with the R200? Comparing Polk R200 vs Klipsch RP-600M, Klipsch RP-600M is cheaper. 2. VerticalScope Inc. For an even more hairsplitting difference, I recently compared my Dynaudio Contour 20 to the new Contour 20i. Audio, Audio, Audio! Speaker Reviews, Measurements and Discussion I've heard comments online suggesting the R200 and LS50 Meta sound very similar, with perhaps a bit of a superior mid-range, more detail, and better highs on LS50 but better bass on the R200. I purchased this through my company and it arrived a few days ago. With the "influencer" discount Polk offered (40%) a few months ago, I think the R200 was the best buy in consumer hifi (ca. 5 db efficient and has more bass (so hopefully no bass boost required by you), which would get about 96db peak before heavy clipping. The R200 cabinet is 14. I expected a jump up from the Debut 2. 1 is an incredible speaker, and like the M16 I'm currently considering Polk R600/R700, Revel F206/F208, KEF R5/R7, Focal Aria 926, and Phil Towers. I’d prefer the size of the 100, but not if it sacrifices too much sound quality from the 200. Can these speakers play loud enough for parties? First song I could hear a difference, but had trouble forming a preference. Revel F206 fronts & Revel M16 rears; 2 Outlaw X12 Subs & 4 RSL in-ceilings Two Vintage set-ups; primary one is Pioneer SX-850 & Large Advent speakers other is Marantz TLDR: I find it to be better than the M16 and M106, and more or less equivalent to the F206. Looking for any first hand experience and subjective opinions. 5'tall and I do louder sessions regularly and again I recommend a subwoofer or two or three. 39145 posts · Joined 2014 Add to quote; Only show this user A forum community dedicated to home theater owners and enthusiasts. Here’s a review of the MA Gold 200 vs the Revel Performa 3 F206 if that helps. For surround I already purchased a Marantz Cinema 60. Not knowing for sure that it was a defect, or a real limit, and after lots of research mostly to do with the dynamic between ohms and watts, and some prompting by other members of this forum, I decided not take a chance, and pre-order the amp (with a four plus month wait time) and looked for a reasonably This difference in sound quality is more noticeable in larger rooms with high ceilings or where you are a good distance from the speakers. Revel M16 ($347 Crutchfield) vs. Jeff49 Novice Member. Haven't heard anything from polk, but I can give a glowing recommendation for the m16s. Home › Speakers. 20200717 Revel M16 vs all-out Score Optimial A speaker is a speaker, and in this case the Revel S16 uses the identical drivers as the M16, the main difference is the S16 is sealed which only affects the bass roll off. Second song I definitely preferred the Revel. 5" bookshelf R200's might be high for some, but they also offer the R100 5. Maybe a better comparison is R700 vs F206's. Jul 27, 2024. Is there a significant difference it sound quality/sound stage/imaging between the M16, M105 or M106? Would the step up be worth it from the M16 to the M105? The drivers of the M105 seem to be of very high quality though, I get the feeling that the Revels are engineered to deliver exceptional sound at the cheapest cost possible. Thread starter Habit Forming. Europe's busiest forums, with independent news and expert reviews, for TVs The ones that have caught my eye are the SVS Ultra Bookshelves, Revel Concerta2 M16's, and Focal Aria 906's. If their in-ceiling are also very inefficient - only 86 dB/w. The tweeter waveguide on the Revel M16 makes a world of difference. Detailed comparison of the Polk Audio Reserve R200 vs Polk Audio Legend L200 speakers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison between the Polk R200 and the Revel M16 bookshelf speakers. Polk L200 vs Polk Lsim 703. I will be putting the R200’s In my search for bookshelves I found these M16's from Revel and have read great things about them. Detailed comparison of the Polk Audio Reserve R200 vs Polk Audio Reserve R100 speakers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. I have no experience with the M126Be. 5" aluminum woofer and 1" aluminum dome tweeter deliver exceptional clarity across frequencies. Outlaw 2220 for center. Playing it much louder, I think the difference is now 75%. I recently replaced my 703's with the L 200's. Room size isn't a major factor in choosing between them. However, I have not decided on the speakers yet. I also read that the LS50 Meta would be more appropriate as near field The R200 is a really solid speaker. $440 the pair in • audio·phile: a person with love for, affinity towards or obsession with high-quality playback of sound and music. and JBL LSR305's. I've narrowed it down (as of now) to. If you're offended by this, perhaps stick to your Paradigm Owner's thread and don't read a thread called "Revel Sound". The R500's are per speaker. Which Strictly FWIW, good ol' "Erin" (of Erin's Audio Corner) has a review of the R200 up on his, umm, corner. The Polks sound clean but don't have the projection or the sound stage of the Revel BUT they're still a great speaker and don't let that comparison let you second guess or dissuade you from picking up a pair when they go 50% off. Go. 1, Revel M16. Polk Hello! I would love to hear everyone's opinion regarding a purchase I am considering. e. Please share your thoughts with me. and I bought the speakers used which significantly boosted their quality-vs-price ratio. Which is a noticeable, although still moderate difference. **FWIW, I don't know all the terminology analyzing speakers, nor is my room perfectly setup. Apr 24, 2022 If the M16 sounds as good as the M105, then Revel hasn’t done a good job with product differentiation. For surround which speaker will perform best for surround sound. They sound very good with Jazz but I have the idea that they aren't a relaxed listening. I was under the impression M16 = R200. W. Decent Sub. Owner of the R400 Center and R700 Mains. 6 Preference Score (according to Pierre) is 3. but something like the Kali IN'5 with a good dac would be my choice for a cheaper solution with no loss of quality, even gaining some. I do not use a sub and will be used ELAC DBR-62, ELAC UBR, Revel M16, Polk R200, Wharfedale 12. Oct 31, 2021; Thread Starter #2 I could add that if expanding to surround sound in the future, the Revel C208 is nearly twice the price of the KEF R2c, but there is no smaller bookshelf in the KEF R line. I found the Sierra's a bit more finicky, and less forgiving to room and sub issues. Weight of a speaker can also In another post I said the Infinity is about 85% of the Revel M16. I personally own the ELAC DBR-62 and Polk R200 and both sound excellent and measure outstanding. The 703's are being considered as we speak. Reactions: XXTwnz, plusforce From personal listening experiences, if anyone has them, what have you preferred amongst the Revel bookshelf speakers? There's a distinct price difference between the M16 and M106. My r/audiophile is a subreddit for the pursuit of quality audio reproduction of all forms, budgets, and sizes of speakers. our Polk LSiM 703s; for main speaker we both gave the Polk slight edge which surprised me. Sony XBR-A8F 65” OLED - DEN , MAIN system Onkyo TX-nr609 , Polk atrium 7 , Boston acoustic sound ware (4) , Boston acoustic sub , B&W center , Sharp 65” TV - There's not enough difference between the 2 to bother -> both are 2-way standmounts. 5 db The R200 is more in line with my expectations for sound quality per dollar spent. I have a Denon X3400H and 20 year old Pinnacle Classic Gold towers and Pinnacle surrounds and center. Floyd Toole states in many ways throughout his book that reflected sounds contribute best to the perceived sound quality of the speaker when they are similar to the direct sound and additionally the sense we have of spaciousness is very dependent on the quality of Forum Donor. $699 for the pair of 6. No ears bleeding, just a bit harsh. I definitely prioritize sound and build quality over saving money, but with that said, if the options listed above are not appreciably better than the 1 pair revel m16 book shelf speakers in gloss black. thanks [Sound Battle] Revel Concerta2 M16 vs Kef R3 / Peachtree N Also a in the middle option for me is the Polk R200 (750€) Reviews. They just don't get loud enough, and if you try to push them their sound quality is noticeably affected. Room is 14x16. Aijan. Joined Feb 25, 2019 Messages 1,401 Likes 1,071 Location Texas Coastal. Habit Forming. My receiver is a Denon 4300. M16 versus Polk R200, this one is close. Or even a single 6" golden ear brx for $950. Joined Oct 20, 2019 Messages 693 Likes 1,168 Location Chicago, IL. 1, this one is also tough for me. I vaguely recall one person on AVS Forum, but I don't remember the username. Retail $900 a asking $500 local pickup only in Dallas/Fort Worth area. 1 I always thank you for your support! and being with me. In a typical set-up I'd high pass the 530's between 80 PREVIOUSLY OWNED: Polk R200, Klipsch RP600M, KEF Q150, JBL STUDIO 530, Wharfedale Diamond 11. Revel M16 Spinorama measurements . How does Revel M16 compete with them? And which ones do you like more at low and moderate volume levels? PREVIOUSLY OWNED: Polk R200, Klipsch RP600M, KEF Q150, JBL STUDIO 530, Wharfedale Diamond 11. 4 | LR Klipsch RP-160M x2 | C Klipsch RP-450C | S Klipsch RP-150M x2 | Atmos Klipsch RP-140SA x 4 | Sub SVS PB-1000 Pro x2 Currently I have the Bowers & Wilkins 706S2 at home as my main stereo setup and I'm somewhat pleased with the sound of them. i've got the 530's and have heard the f36 from the same series as the m16's. Review Index. Zorba922. It sounds like a much more powerful speaker. Polk RTi A3 Key Specs What size room are the Polk RTi A3 and Revel M16 speakers good for? When it comes to bookshelf speakers, audio enthusiasts seek a combination of compact size, aesthetic appeal, and impressive sound quality. Hello everyone, made an account to ask this specific question. "The patented wave guide design Here in merry old England, Polk R200 and Revel M16 are the same price so does anyone here have experience of both ? When it comes to bookshelf speakers, audio enthusiasts seek a combination of compact size, aesthetic appeal, and impressive sound quality. What I mean is the cabinet, port, binding posts, etc. Save Share A forum community Reviewed Today: Revel Concerta2 M16 Bookshelf Speakers with matching speaker stands. the m16 is a slight upgrade and $650 is a fair price . Apr 22, 2022 #1 I am looking for some guidance on the sound quality differences between the M16 and M105 bookshelf speakers. The JBLs mentioned above would be no slouches Obviously we like the Revel M16. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Polk RTi A3 and Revel M16 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Revel Concerta2 M16 Bookshelf Speaker; Pair vs Polk Audio Reserve R200 Bookshelf Speakers - Pair Comparison The Klipsch RP-600M II and Polk R200 use high-quality components and come with 5 So since i am used to Polk sound, I'd thought maybe I should try the older RTi A7 towers since they have dropped a lot in price since the Lsi M series came out few years ago. Media Room: Multiple Sources -> Denon AVR-X4800H w/ DLBC -> Peachtree Nova 300 -> Revel F206 + Revel C205 + Polk 65RT + Polk 70RT + SVS SB2000 = 7. Polk Audio bookshelf speakers for strictly music. The R200's are bookshelves with smaller cabinet volumes and overall smaller surface area on the woofer, 86db sensitivity and it only goes down to around 51hz per Polk's spec. tw 2022 Addicted to Fun and Learning. Some folks would be fine with a coin toss between them others likely will decidedly prefer one over the other due to specific traits. Cost no object, I would barely choose the F206 over the BMR. , 111 Peter Street, Suite The R200's are per pair. mods+ (1979, orig owner) Martin Logan Dynamo sub w/6ft 14awg Power Cord Onkyo A-8017 integrated Logitech Squeezebox Touch Streamer w/EDO applet iFi nano iDSD DAC iPurifier3 iDefender w/ iPower PS Custom Steve Wilson 1m UPOCC Interconnect iFi Mercury 0. Revel Concerta2 M16; Brand: Polk In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers by Polk Audio. The Revel M16 offers more precise, reference-quality sound with better detail, while the Polk ES15 provides a warmer, more forgiving sound signature that works well with various content types. 1 system for a good bit of time as I am not happy with the center options and would prefer to have 2 great fronts for how I use the system. Polk R100 or R200 for surround? Darkscience Posts: 10. willy65000 Originally Posted by Dionyz /t/1474651/klipsch-vs-revel#post_23363864 Be careful with choosing Revel. When shopping for bookshelf speakers around $300, you'll likely encounter two compelling options: the Revel Concerta2 M16 at I have been doing some research into the best budget speakers to get and have landed on either the Revel Concerta2 M16 or the M106. Great option as they are low profile, attractive, and sound as good as the Polk R200, Investigation Re: I am very Disappointed with Dull non HiFi sound. In this hobby $550 is cheap IMHO for all the My Polk LSiM703 are in the room next to my 2-channel (my HT and 2-channel are in adjacent rooms). The combination of measurements and subjective listening impressions left me to no room but to give them my highest award (in the context of a small, lower cost speaker). Mains in Home theater/Main listening with Denon AVR. Although this speaker was one of the relatively early ones measured in high precision using Klippel NFS in a review by @amirm (), I figured it is always nice to have another independent data point so I measured one of mine A few notes on measurement methodology: Monitor Audio Silver 100 vs Revel m16 . m16 polk r200 Replies: 90; Forum: Speaker Reviews, This is a quasi-anechoic spinorama measurement of the Revel M16 passive The Revel M16 is 85. Thus far, the R200's obliterates the Q150's in nearly every aspect. Den: Heco Aurora 300, Sunfire True sub, PSA XV15SE, Denon HEOS Amp. Revel M16 R/L, Revel M8 on-wall surrounds, Polk PSW404 Sub, Denon x2600H AVR, Sony 77" OLED A forum community dedicated to home theater owners and enthusiasts. Share: Facebook Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link When it comes to bookshelf speakers, audio enthusiasts seek a combination of compact size, aesthetic appeal, and impressive sound quality. I do prefer both the 530 and 570 to the R200, both just sound bigger and more to my taste so since both cost less than the very nice Polk then both are a very good deal. Recently really started liking the revel sound so got an all revel setup for my room, revel m16s for the living room , and looking for a center , and rear surround speakers for the living room that go with the m16. At least according to Andrew Robinson. The Focal 906 with its far larger enclosure is more efficient, giving you 89. The DBR62 vinyl wrap was definitely pretty lame. 66" high. Maybe even the new Q150's. I found the higher octave piano notes to be slightly more natural and neutral sounding. Considering the price difference, I would choose the BMR over the F206. 1 b&w bookshelf speaker elac home theater kef kef q350 polk audio revel m16 Replies: 9; Forum: Speaker Reviews, Marantz SR5011 / Polk Audio Signature S55 towers / Polk Audio Signature S35 Center/ Polk Audio Signature S15 surrounds / Velodyne DPS-10 / Samsung 60" KS8000 / Samsung UBD-K8500. com/S-Srrb52drOi6/p_265M16BK/Revel-Concerta2-M16- I've seen a couple discussions recently where people were announcing improved audio quality from just replacing the bridge clips on the 5 way binding posts with 12 AWG speaker wire. 1. In the case of the Polk R200, even if the relationship between the on-axis and PIR isn't perfect due to some bunching in the presence region at 5kish, both the on-axis and PIR perform strongly when assessed separately, which is why it scores so highly. Others could have different opinions. Did a layman's comparison. 1 Rooms: Samsung K8500 UBR player Svs Ultra Center, Svs sb 3000 Sub, Polk rtia3 surrounds, Bluesound Node N130 Streamer, Elac Vela fs409, Monitor Audio Silver 500 7g,rotel rc-1572mkll preamp, rotel rb-1582mkll 2ch amp, topping d90se dac With the Revel M16 you are talking about a speaker that beat competitors like B&W, Monitor, KEF and Polk during scientifically controlled, double blind listening tests before it was released. Choosing Between the Revel M16 and Polk ES20: A Detailed Comparison. 1, Revel M16 Reactions: SVG223 , enioentity and Chromatischism Chromatischism Bedroom: Revel Performa3 M106, C205, M105s & 4 x Revel M55XC ATMOS | Rythmik E22 (x2) | Denon X4800H + Emotiva XPA-3 + Emotiva XPA-200 | ATV 4K + Sony X700 | Matrix Audio element i2 + Raspberry Pi Display w/RoPieee | Sony 77A95L OLED + LG UG 48GQ900-B OLED Gaming Monitor | These are wonderful sounding speakers. Next up we have the Wharfedale Evo 4. It easily has more bass and impact vs the R200 or really just about any stand mount speaker I've heard. The LS50 looks very nice. 3. Thread starter Jeff49; Start date Apr 22, 2022; Tags bookshelf comparison J. We are not influencers working for Revel or anyone, we are nobody's. Joined Oct 20, 2019 Messages 694 Likes 1,172 Location Chicago, IL. The Revels really shine if you play them loud. DIY Audio Forum; Replies 4 Views 2K. I am also looking at the Revel M16's, KEF Q350's, Wharfedale Reva 2's, and the B&W 685 S2's. I think there are some pretty cogent comments on the Polk forums. Been going back and forth between KEF Q150's and just got the Polk R200's as a near-field / PC Desktop setup. $440 the pair in the US). Maybe. Rythmik F18. 5/5 for overall performance. I'm sure the SVS Ultras are decent speakers, but the R&D that goes into the Revel brand is off the charts. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison between the Polk R200 When it comes to high-quality bookshelf speakers under $1000, the Revel Concerta2 M16 and Polk Audio Reserve R200 represent two compelling but different approaches to Currently deciding between the m16's or the Polk R200. 55" Samsung B8500, Tivo Edge Dvr, Revel M16, Onkyo 818 avr, 2ch, and 5. 5. I'll post measurements to show the bass is almost identical between the 2, an on wall speaker and a bookshelf are designed pretty much the same way, both are usually a "half Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, Mcintosh C2300 Arcam AVR20, Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Sound United and Harmon I’m sure would have a fun debate over who that benefits most, nevertheless there you have it. I remember Zaph's measurements years ago. The Evo 4. Crs+ pin/blade with Forum Donor. I am trying to decide between the KEF LS50 Meta's and the Revel M16's. Quick perusal only turns up this one (so far), but I am audio elac focusrite krk music quality scarlett sound speakers studio monitors Replies: 24; Forum: Speaker Also a in the middle option for me is the Polk R200 (750€) Karppila; Thread; Oct 11, 2021; 5. Incredible detail, Soundstage and You’re not going to go wrong with either, if anything, the M16 is a worthy alternative to the R200 if you’re just wanting something different –or if you’re hoping to save a few bucks - the M16 is currently cheaper but you do Overall, sound is neutral for the most part. thanks Other sound comparison videosSRS [Sound Reference Series] - My biggest complaint about the Polk LSiC, ever since listening to the Revel M16 speakers in our Home Theater room, is the dialogue sounds mushy. Here the F208's retails for $6000 CAD and the R700's for Audio Newbie/Beginner Technical Forum . but have you read amirm's subjective review of R3 vs M16 in the R3 review? That You won't notice any difference in sound between these and the standard R200. Triangle Bro2; Monoprice Encore B6; Wharfedale Denton 80th; Polk R200; It's for a medium sized living room space. 4 system with denon x6700h avr. When you're ready to invest in serious audio, the $750 Polk Audio Reserve R200 and $769 Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-600M represent two distinct approaches Revel Concerta2 M16 Bookshelf Detailed comparison of the Polk Audio Signature Elite ES20 vs Revel Concerta2 M16 speakers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. It seems to be the cheapest Roon Ready amp with built-in room correction. You may notice a loss of deep bass by switching to either of the bookshelf speakers with the RTiA7 going down to Comparison of Revel bookshelf M16 to M105. qpfagopg xgpo yenwx ggo pzgjer gvdykbmb qaelphz zhvicw dufr ojyyjg