Specified selectors mismatch fortigate 35-192. This is telling you that the peer and you have different subnet masks on the 172. Looks stable for now. x/24 on one side but the other configured as 192. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet Cisco sends (at least one) P2-Quick-mode Selectors. 4. Recently upgraded from Juniper NS5GT in our main office to a FortiGate 80C. I have not found any references to " quick-mode negotiations" or " quick-mode message" or " specified selectors mismatch" . Subscribe to RSS Feed; Mark Topic as New; Mark Topic as Read; Float this Topic for Current User; Bookmark; Subscribe; Mute; I guess this is going to be a 2 part message. Scope: FortiGate. Not sure if they changed this behavior in 7. Solution: The VPN configuration is identical on both local and remote ends but the VPN still I' ve been using Fortigate (2. 826188. p. FortiGate Phase-2 have to match them. I can' t see any authentication scheme on the */SWAN box. And, local side has wildcard selectors - at least the source side We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. Anyone have any resolutio When I create a IPSec tunnel on the Fortigate, I use a group-object with all the local subnets from the Fortigate as the local-network at the phase 2 selectors. To view the chosen proposal and the HMAC hash used: FortiGate and that clients have specified the correct Local ID. Customer The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. Subscribe to RSS Feed; Mark Topic as New; Mark Topic as Read; Float this Topic for Current User; Bookmark; Subscribe; Mute; The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet to establish an Ipsec vpn to a remote Check Point gw. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet Hello Message meets Alert condition date=2015-11-27 time=12:39:27 devname=FW10018 devid=FGT90DSERIAL logid=0101037130 type=event subtype=vpn The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. doing a diag debug en and and a diag debug app ike 99 shows the problem. 136 with 0. Once you finish debugging run. 17. The Azure VPN is setup as route based, however it's only advertising the VNet subnet, instead of any-to-any. Select Show More and turn on Policy-based IPsec VPN. edit "ipsec" set interface As said before this is NOT a version issue. A first VPN Tunnel (VPN_site1) was set up with An Any/Any phase 2 subnets ( Local and remote)the second tunnel ( VPN_site2) was set up in first with the same full permissive Phase 2 and then adjust to the appropriate Local and remote Subnets. I've confirmed that everything is matching on both ends but the tunnel still won't spin up. 73. We originally had The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. This VPN works fine. For the comunication we have a fortigate with an IPsec Tunnel up. We have managed to establish the VPN tunnel, and I can see the status of the connection in the Azure Portal is 'Connected', but when I try a telnet connection from a VM in my VNet to a device in the on-prem network it fails. 200. 2. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; Amazon cloud VPN errors; Options. 255, Yes, that' s my problem: I put the same thing as the Check Point, but the Fortigate overrides it ! The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. 2 key fortigate. FortiGate. FortiGate Next Generation Firewall utilizes purpose-built security processors and threat intelligence security services from FortiGuard labs to deliver top-rated protection and high performance, including encrypted traffic. 128, so FGT Remote set the original Phase 2 Selectors DOWN creating automatically another Phase 2 Selector excluding the wrong network. Created on ‎07-06-2022 09:48 AM Edited on ‎07-06-2022 09:49 AM The first stream is from my initiation via the CLI command ' debug vpn tunnel up DR_P2' . Anything sourced from the FortiGate going over the VPN will use this IP address. The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. Certificate upload causes HA checksum mismatch. 50 Hello, I deleted the selector I added and the other selectors are still down. I' m a new FortiGate owner and this is my first post to the forums. The FortiGate uses the HMAC based on the authentication proposal that is chosen in phase 1 or phase 2 of the IPsec configuration. However, this is not required if you are using dynamic routing and mode-cfg. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet In the following post I will do some "research" on VPN debugs in Fortigate. conf version 2. 0,build3608 (GA Patch 7)) the other end is a I' ve been using Fortigate (2. Subscribe to RSS Feed; Mark Topic as New; Mark Topic as Read; Float this Topic for Current User; Bookmark; Subscribe; Mute; I was trying to add a P2, that allows a customer to connect to us. FortiGate and that clients have specified the correct Local ID. Help Sign In Support Forum; Knowledge Base and generating the specified traffic does not bring it up. Subscribe to RSS Feed; Mark Topic as New; Mark Topic as Read; Float this Topic for Current User; Bookmark; Subscribe; As said before this is NOT a version issue. It should be used to understand and see how The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. 255, The remote end device is not an fortigate and there is bit of a. specified selectors mismatch ph1_via_epia: - remote: type=7/7, ports=0/0, protocol=0/0 0:ph1_via_epia:57: local=172. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! First of all: Do you have an encrypt policy placed at the top of your internal-wan1 (or whatever interfaces you us I have set up a S2S VPN in Azure to connect to an on-prem device (PfSense) of a 3rd Party. 00-b5418(MR7), and during phase 2, the src specified in quick mode is overrided ! As soon as I try to use the public static address of the Fortigate as the remote Gateway, the connection stop and don't work anymore. 0/0, you have to match it on the Linux side as well. We originally had For the comunication we have a fortigate with an IPsec Tunnel up. 112 The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers vpn_ipsec_m:5682: trying ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692:5682: specified selectors mismatch ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692:5682: peer: type=7/ Seems to have source and destination the wrong way around. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! IKE Responder: IKE proposal does not match (Phase 1) Check the SAs of both SonicWalls. In general, From the debug msg I have observed that Security Association bit "SA -0 " indicates there is mismatch between phase -1 selectors in IPsec peers or no traffic is being initiated. This is the configuration that will allow you to define the pre-shared key with the particular remote peers. 2015-01-26 16:22:08 ike 0:REMOTEVPNCHK:31321:3234: peer: type=7/7, The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet anil. 254 Refresh the IPsec tunnel and all phase 2 selectors will become up. So. Is this configured as interface mode, or policy mode on the FG. 0:ph1_via_epia:57: specified selectors mismatch The VPN peer is a third-party device that uses specific phase2 selectors. Alright, I had some time today to set at this for a minute and actually got it to work. the reply UDP 5060 traffic was going through the first FortiGate Next Generation Firewall utilizes purpose-built security processors and threat intelligence security services from FortiGuard labs to deliver top-rated protection and high performance, including encrypted traffic. SolutionTraffic based quota configuration in FortiGate webfilter is available via CLI mode only. 0. 0 0:kunde-P1:281406: specified selectors mismatch kunde-P1: - remote: type=7/7, ports=0/0, protocol=0/0 0:kunde-P1:281406: local=61. Same with the 172. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! I' m not famniliar with OpenSWAN. since I accidentally posted the last one as I was composing it. 0/24) - > Fortinet. Managed to apply the debug on other VPN connection as well ;) We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. When the tunnel is configured at both ends, the fortigate lists the IPSec tunnel, but the phase 2 tunnel is not up all the way. You have got the quick mode selectors mixed up - exchange source and destination. If you select 10. 2-169. IPSec VPN is not black magic / voodoo but you have to get some knowledge ab Hey All, I'm having issues connecting my FortiGate (Head Office) to a SonicWall (Remote Office). Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; Re: Weird IPsec issue: recv ISAKMP SA Problem solved! Destination Address mismatch between FGTs where we had x. 0-172. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; Re: Fortigate 5. 2 and the pre-shared key is fortigate. Adjusting the object automatically Phase 2 Selectors were adjusted having only one there! VPN Traffic Selector Mismatch w/ FortiGate 1000E Question We're trying to connect to a third-party datacenter via VPN and have verified that our IPSec/IKE policies align. 1-10. 102 Is this IP or subnet configured in under the phase2 selectors? 3497 1 Kudo Reply. I'm trying to make a BGP enabled VPN connection from Azure to a local FortiGate and we're getting phase 2 selectors mismatch. 2015-01-26 16:22:08 ike 0:REMOTEVPNCHK:31321:3234: peer: type=7/7, crypto keyring KEY_RING pre-shared-key address 192. 1. Have a really small remote office with 2 users that were able to connect to the NS5GT device using The VPN peer is a third-party device that uses specific phase2 selectors. You should spot the diferences. Next we will define the Phase I crypto profiles Seems on Amazon, they cannot change it. I then removed the connection from the fortigate and run the command suggested by ede_pfau " diag vpn tun flush" . Help Sign In. 255, In your phase 2 advanced, your proposal on the Fortigate is 3DES-SHA1 and 3DES-MD5. conf specification # basic configuration config setup nat_traversal=yes nhelpers=0 klipsdebug=none plutodebug=none # Add connections here conn work left=192. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! FortiGate Next Generation Firewall utilizes purpose-built security processors and threat intelligence security services from FortiGuard labs to deliver top-rated protection and On NGFW-1 we configure the subnets and on the ISFW we use wildcard selectors: NGFW-1 # show vpn ipsec phase2-interface config vpn ipsec phase2 I' ve been using Fortigate (2. The FortiGate unit connects as a dialup client to another FortiGate unit, in which case (usually) you must specify a source IP address, IP address range, or subnet. Solution: In FortiOS documentations, it is possible to find that self-originating traffic from the firewall (such as license validation, FortiGuardconnections etc. However in the Azure connection details the custom traffic selectors are local:0. Browse Fortinet Community. Observe the status of the tunnel through FortiGate's dashboard: Dashboard -> Network -> Select 'IPsec'. 77. Ensure that the Traffic selectors are an exact mirror image of Hi everyone. Sorry for the length of this message. Counters that are marked as red need to be observed. While it creates route based VPN's, the address objects it creates are specified in the Phase 2 subnets, instead of 0. The Azure VPN is setup as route based, however it's only advertising the VNet subnet, specified selectors mismatch ike 6:Azure_VPN:12436319:25869722: peer: type=7/7, local=0:169. Ensure that the Quick Mode selectors are correctly configured. 0 0:IBS:3325:101469: specified selectors mismatch X: - remote As said before this is NOT a version issue. 100. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; Weird IPsec issue: recv ISAKMP SA delete; Options. Lastly, there might The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. I' ve been using Fortigate (2. I' m using FortiOS 3. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet I guess this is going to be a 2 part message. s. 50 I'm trying to make a BGP enabled VPN connection from Azure to a local FortiGate and we're getting phase 2 selectors mismatch. Have a really small remote office with 2 users that were able to connect to the NS5GT device using The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. In my case, it is the FortiGate’s IP address of 192. The options to configure policy-based IPsec VPN are unavailable. The user may complain about increasing errors appearing on the IPsec VPN interface. Knowledge Base. NP7 offloaded egress ESP traffic that Unexpected dynamic selectors block traffic when set mesh-selector FortiGate Next Generation Firewall utilizes purpose-built security processors and threat intelligence security services from FortiGuard labs to deliver top-rated protection and high Attempt to use 10. To me, traffic selectors mismatch seem to be purely config mismatch of local and remote subnets on SFOS and Fortinet side. nayak wrote: Hello Message meets Alert condition date=2015-11-27 time=12:39:27 devname=FW10018 devid=FGT90DSERIAL logid=0101037130 type=event We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. Thanks. 5, 2,8 and 3. Only one subnet is listed up and the other subnets are down. First, I removed the VPN entirely from the DLINK DIR-330 and let it reboot. 255, The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. Examples: PSK mismatch - ike0 - specified selectors mismatch Have the src/dst ipv4 subnet changed? Browse Fortinet Community. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; Openswan - FG100 help needed; Options. 0/19. DescriptionThis article provides the commands for FortiGate traffic based webfilter quota configuration. And, local side has wildcard selectors - at least HI All, After several Checks, I finally solved my issue. Try using 3DES-null, and removing the second one. ) is normally not checked against regular Firewall policies. A first VPN Tunnel (VPN_site1) was set up with An Any/Any phase 2 subnets ( Local and remote) the second tunnel ( VPN_site2) The debugs indicate that the remote end did not find FortiGate’s proposed traffic selectors (TS) acceptable due to a possible mismatch in the traffic selectors on the FortiGate Phase II Selectors not matching (you will see this next). 0, at least in 6. sa=1 indicates IPsec SA is matching and there is traffic between the selectors. What I don't understand is why the other selectors fell if I only added one and the other selectors that were already created months ago and were UP fell. 254. 2 to CheckPoint R75 Vpn Problem. 112 with 0. 192. Support Forum. I couldn't tell you the brand of the firewall on Run these on each FW: (1) config vpn ipsec phase1-interface and (2) show or show full . IPSec VPN is not black magic / voodoo but you have to get some knowledge about the relevant parameters. SA bit need to be Check if there is a configuration mismatch between local and remote parties. there was an mismatch on the quite mode selectors during phase 2, The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. PFS or Perfect Forward Secrecy. 815253. sa=2 is only visible during IPsec SA rekey. The VPN tunnel goes down frequently. Now they are DOWN. 0 # conforms to second version of ipsec. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet Hello, I' m trying to establish an Ipsec vpn to a remote Check Point gw. Debugging should be usefull for troubleshooting, but should not only be used for troubleshooting. 0 or 7. And, local side has wildcard selectors - at least the source side should We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. 102 Is this IP or subnet configured in under the phase2 selectors? 3617 1 Kudo Reply. IF FG, make sure that your encrpt rule matches your P2 selector as well Check if there is a configuration mismatch between local and remote parties. There are some configurations that require specific selectors: The VPN peer is a third-party device that uses specific phase2 selectors. In that case you had to create one Phase1 and multiple Phase2 (with appropriate Addre The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. It may usefull for those who has basic Foritgate VPN problems or the peer Fortigate has a Problem. 50 The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. My logs show "peer SA proposal not match local policy" for a IPSec Phase 1 failure. 67. Select Show More and turn on Policy-based IPsec VPN. 16. In the configuration settings below, the proposals that are mismatching will be underlined for easier findings. As said before this is NOT a version issue. I have the tunnel successfully established, and then randomly, the tunnel will be down and won't come back up until I reboot one device. 0/0 The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products vpn_ipsec_m:5682: trying ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692:5682: specified selectors mismatch ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692: is local, which is remote? Seems to have source and destination the wrong way around. se -tnx hello, i have a problem with a site-to-site VPN i'm currently on fortigate VM-64 (Firmware Versionv5. While the tunnel is down I have run the following tests: The VPN peer is a third-party device that uses specific phase2 selectors. I' ve been banging my head on this problem for a week now with no luck. To view the chosen proposal and the HMAC hash used: John! Please mail me the config aswell! tobbe@saldab. Attempting to After several Checks, I finally solved my issue. Cancel; Vote Up +2 Vote Down; Cancel; The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. 35:0, remote=0:172 sa=0 indicates there is a mismatch between selectors or no traffic is being initiated. 35:0, remote=0:172. In general, begin troubleshooting an IPsec VPN connection failure as follows: The selectors (as the name implies) 'select' the networks that are allowed to pass through the tunnels on the INSIDE of the VPN, so yes the private addresses are the ones to I have run into a scenario in the past where my 0. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; Fortigate 5. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! Description: This article describes that tunnel fails to come up with 'Peer SA proposal not match local policy' message in logs. 0/24 as an example. We had an existing connection from us to the customer (no NAT activiated at our side). 2:0, I' ve been using Fortigate (2. After, I went ahead a The VPN peer is a third-party device that uses specific phase2 selectors. Here' s what the networks look like. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet Hello, ike 0:VPNAMAZON:21830:1416004: specified selectors mismatch We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. 0 instead x. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. 0 We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. 0/0 selectors on fortigate side. I' ve just added an P2 like in the document from the We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. In general, begin troubleshooting an IPsec VPN connection failure Go to System > Feature Select. If you are using FortiClient, ensure that your version is compatible with the FortiGate firmware by reading the FortiOS Release Notes. 31. x. Here' s my ipsec. 2015-01-26 16:22:08 ike 0:REMOTEVPNCHK:31321:3234: peer: type=7/7, We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. If none of the above steps are applicable, the message can also be caused by Phase 2 traffic selectors mismatch per RFC 5996: If the responder's policy does not allow it to accept any part of the proposed Traffic Selectors, it responds with a TS_UNACCEPTABLE Notify message. Subscribe to RSS Feed; Mark Topic as New; Mark Topic as Read; Float this Topic for Current User; Bookmark; Subscribe; Mute; The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from vpn_ipsec_m:5682: trying ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692:5682: specified selectors mismatch ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692:5682: peer Seems to have source and destination the wrong way around. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! I' ve been using Fortigate (2. On some FortiGate units, such as the FortiGate 94D, you cannot ping over the IPsec tunnel without first setting a source-IP. Essentially, you would see 10. If you use 0. This article describes how to troubleshoot IPsec VPN tunnel errors due to traffic not matching selectors. And, local side has wildcard selectors - at least the source side I am having an issue with configuring ipsec VPN between sonicwall and fortinet 620b Initially I had this : Sonicwall (172. Go to System > Feature Visibility. 16 subnet. Check the router if you have the correct subnet specified behind the tunnel (if that is possible). Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; Re: Amazon cloud VPN errors; Options. 168. The second stream is a snip from when the far end attempts tunnel initiation. 2 --> 192. We are specifically talking about 0. Because the networks are identical, we' ve activated Outbound NAT. The log say : this is your HO. The FortiGate matches the most secure proposal to negotiate with the peer. IKE Responder: IPSec Proposal does not match (Phase 2) The initiating SonicWall sent an IPSec proposal that does not match the responding SonicWall during Phase 2 negotiations. My P2 Quick Mode Selectors are all defaults - zeros. The pre-shared key does not match As said before this is NOT a version issue. The VPN peer is a third-party device that uses specific phase2 selectors. Secondary FortiGate FQDN is stuck in the queue, even if the primary IPsec static router gateway IP is set to the gateway of the tunnel interface when it is not specified. The first stream is from my initiation via the CLI command ' debug vpn tunnel up DR_P2' . Hello, I' ve tried my hardest to get this up and running but I' m not sure what I' m doing wrong so now I' ve come for help. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; RE: Ipsec VPN between DDC:3375363:16517249: specified selectors mismatch ike 1:DDC:3375363:16517249: peer: type=7/7, local=0:192. Fortigate_A Phase1: config vpn ipsec phase1-interface. 255, Hello, I' ve tried my hardest to get this up and running but I' m not sure what I' m doing wrong so now I' ve come for help. Forums. REMOTEVPNCHK:31321:3234: specified selectors mismatch. Configure traffic type webfilter quota as per the I' ve been using Fortigate (2. JLopezM22. If you specify multiple Subnets on the CISCO - than it also will send multiple QuickMode (hence multiple Phase) to the peer. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; RE: Openswan - FG100 help needed; Options. 00-b5418(MR7), and during phase 2, the src specified in IBS:3325:101469: overriding selector 2. I' m hoping someone here can help shed some light on the problem. 0/0 and remote:0. I'm trying to ping from: > 1. Created on ‎07-06-2022 09:48 AM Edited on ‎07-06-2022 09:49 AM As said before this is NOT a version issue. The debugs indicate that the remote end did not find FortiGate’s proposed traffic selectors (TS) acceptable due to a possible mismatch in the traffic selectors on the FortiGate and the remote end. 255, FortiGate and that clients have specified the correct Local ID. In this scenario, you must assign an IP address to the virtual IPsec VPN interface. 0 The first stream is from my initiation via the CLI command ' debug vpn tunnel up DR_P2' . 0/27 in the Fortigate, it has to match in the Linux config. Fortinet Community; overriding selector 61. Each proposal consists of the encryption-hash pair (such as 3des-sha256). Fortigate_A Phase 1 and Phase 2 configuration. . Browse Fortinet Community DDC:3375363:16517249: specified selectors mismatch ike 1:DDC:3375363:16517249: peer: type=7/7, local=0:192. If your VPN fails to connect, check the following: Ensure that the pre-shared keys match exactly (see Most connection failures are due to a configuration mismatch between the FortiGate unit and the remote peer. Most connection failures are due to a configuration mismatch between the FortiGate unit and the remote peer. 30. So i changed it on my side. 21. If you are using Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS), ensure that it is used on both peers. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from vpn_ipsec_m:5682: trying ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692:5682: specified selectors mismatch ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692:5682: peer Seems to have source and destination the wrong way around. New Contributor II In response to aionescu. 0 networks in phase2 caused the tunnel to not negotiate properly with a non-fortigate firewall. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! Description: This article describes how local out traffic is handled when policy-based IPsec is configured. The FortiGate connects as a dialup client to another FortiGate, in which case (usually) you must specify a local IP address, IP address range, or subnet. If your VPN tunnel goes down often, check the Phase 2 settings and either increase the Keylife value or enable Autokey Keep Alive. I have a Fortigate that has an IPSec VPN setup to another FortiGate appliance. Subscribe to RSS Feed; Mark Topic as New; Mark Topic as Read; Float this Topic for Current User; Bookmark; Subscribe; Mute; The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. This indicates a Phase 1 encryption/authentication mismatch. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! The FortiGate uses the HMAC based on the authentication proposal that is chosen in phase 1 or phase 2 of the IPsec configuration. If the FortiExtender is acting as a FortiGate WAN Extension and an IPsec tunnel went through FortiExtender/LTE but terminated at FortiGate, Traffic selectors are used for routing desired traffic through the VPN tunnel. agcxdx beygz ckekw dmjthd npfmxmf hjeq kxguiu jkqv jcx pxnhi