Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision example. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22.

Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision example I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. 02 awaiting reviewer scores 22. Fifth review on 23rd January, accepted after minor revision. The reason is that reviewer#2 refers back to the same old comments that he gave at the major revision stage (He just copied and pasted alll the comments mentioned in the major revision stage For example, a junior Reviewer may carefully check the various technical details of the paper, but may also lack the depth to assess the significance of the contribution, while a senior Reviewer may be in a position to judge whether Four months after submitting my research paper, I was asked for a major revision. This change has occurred your answer make sense if article is in initial stage. The journal told me The editor hasn’t yet agreed to take on the assignment. Each round, you, as SE, make the final decision on the disposition of the manuscript. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. 12 Status 11: Awaiting Editor Final Processing 12. These submissions can Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). I submitted the revised manuscript after one-and-a-half months. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. First, write about the major issues, including problems with the study’s method or analysis. 28 Major Revision 8. 8 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. After Journal of Fluid Mechanics uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. . tral examples of each recommendation are provided in the screenshots below): 1) Publish As Is. 9 Awaiting SE Assignment ADM: Zhang, Jade Major revision: December 21, 2020 Awaiting reviewer scores: January 6, 2021 Accepted: February 7, 2021 Major Revision (21-Dec-2020), Awaiting Reviewer Scores (6-Jan-2021)I will continue to update after acceptance. Sixth review on 23rd March, accepted after minor In general, reject with resubmission is equivalent to a major revision in other journals; i. Initially your manuscript will go through stages such as “Awaiting Admin Checklist” and/or “Awaiting Editor Assignment” depending on how new submissions are initially checked on the journal. Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). There is nothing wrong with but it can be annoying as it can delay the publication of the work. As a peer reviewer, it is useful to learn about common reasons for a 'major revision' verdict. At the 1st and 2nd revision, I have revised the paper properly according to the reviewer's comments. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. " kiehl_cat 2023-06-12 Overall, the efficiency is relatively low. After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. Initially the status was "awaiting admin checklist", and then changed to "under After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. This change has occurred I have submitted two articles to a journal. So, the Editorial Board Member (who is like the Associate Editor at other journals) has either sent the revised manuscript to the same three reviewers (if there were three Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. 3 Status 9: Major Revision (1 Month) 12. Anyway, they seem to have found the required number of peer reviewers now, and your At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. Does the article or case study say something original? Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Does that mean one of the reviewer reject the paper after major revision or he excused that he couldn't revise it and if that yes how can the reviewing completed then. Status 4: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. The article has significant deficiencies in content and grammar. First, whether "Revise and 1. Revise. When a manuscript is listed as "In reviewer agreement" in a journal's status, it means that the reviewer or reviewers who have been assigned to the manuscript are Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. major scientific meetings. Reviewer #10: This paper focuses on electric energy forecasting based on artificial intelligence. One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. The authors can still be asked for explanations After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. In fact, there were physical experiments and accompanying UgkR4R‡ ÀÕ=$¢²×ÃN °9iõ¨Z$d^°úãן þûO Á¸û ´lÇåöx}~_¾ÍúïäçËÑ« {ñ¹ Œg^BÈÍ È1¤R²Ý6 Yr$ ›0üo~³ÿ “ÑŽéÆU »J’ý After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ Maybe the reviewer(s) had some spare time, maybe a glance at the paper was enough (although that would be odd, as an editor would normally decide a straight reject if this is what the Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. 30 Status 12: Accept 1. 20 awaiting AE To mention sections, figures, etc. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". During reject and resubmit, I got 3. 26 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. This stage is used less frequently. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon I submitted my manuscript to a journal. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. I have submitted a manuscript to a ScholarOne journal. This change has occurred The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which Latest Articles. 30 TE verifies reviewer comments Reviewer comments: Reviewers B, C, and D agree to accept. 12 Pre-accepted Translation: 5. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. 08. For example, providing final high-quality files or signing a publishing agreement. The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Then I revised and resubmitted. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and accompanying teaching note. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. " After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. Coming to your query, what ‘Editorial assignment pending’ at this stage means is that your revised manuscript is awaiting a review by an associate editor (AE). Find Funding. This change has occurred under several headings: Author, Associate Editor, Reviewer, and General. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. , reviewers think your letter has merit but needs major changes. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. The questions editors ask reviewers. round of reviews or jump to editorial decision immediately – this mostly depends on the magnitude and Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. Geophysics is now a leader among Upon acceptance, you may be asked to complete additional steps. 31 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 6. 20 Major Revision 12. The editor discussed the decision with one of his associates and then asked me to wait for a couple of days to render a final decision. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. Furthermore, you can get inspired by sample peer In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing is needed. The reviewer has raised a new issue in the 2nd revision and the reviewer has recommended me to revise the paper again. So, perhaps the AE believes they can check the manuscript on their own. Possible decisions are Accept, Minor revision, Major revision, and Reject. – The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. or does the editor might assign new reviewers to evaluate . 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. The range of these decisions is (1) reject, (2) reject but invite new submission, (3) major revisions, (4) minor revisions, (5) accept conditionally (very minor revisions), and (6) accept. In the first notification, I got a major revision. The article fulfills all of the requirements listed above and is ready for publication. Promptly complete any requested tasks to avoid publication delays. I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point-by-point This is a common decision after a high quality major revision has been completed. Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript will go through the reviewers comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. I submitted my revision and 5 days after the resubmission the dashboard was converted into "awaiting EIC decision". 4 Translation: Status 1: Editor-in-Chief picks and assigns the Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. The EiC usually reaches a decision within 3 days after receiving the AEs recommendation. The journal says on After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The status of the paper changed several times. Major Revision – This is the typical first round decision for a very good or excellent paper, which will be enhanced substantially by such a revision based on the detailed reviews you have collected. The article took 5 months and I got decision with minor revision. Major revision should only be used if the paper excels in (1) relevance and interest to TACO's audience, and (2) the submission has significant contributions and/or is novel I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Scribes wizards have the reviewer assignment stage that the assigned to the reviewers have the reviewers Requisite number to them, customer use your hipster friends are left playing the editorial and journals Awaiting reviewer selection AE invites at least two reviewers. Revise is the most common type of decision. Second review of the major repair has been ongoing for three months, with the "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" status lasting for two months. However, today, It may include for example: Checking for missing or broken files. An initial assessment will be performed, and the Associate Editor may reject without 11. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. The author’s claims are not Reviewer Guidelines the magazine for high-tech After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Based on the information you have provided though, it was probably a major revision. 9 Awaiting AE Recommendation 11. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 12. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. ’ I don't understand whether this means my paper has been accepted or not? Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. 14 Awaiting AE recommendation 01. Once the requisite number of You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. For example, if all reviewers suggest a major revision and the overall tone is negative toward the paper, or there are multiple 2023-07-10 Awaiting AE Assignment 美丽是只猫 2023-7-8 major revision, 4 reviewers, one of whom raised a lot of questions and even corrected grammar errors. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. The submission is now with the author. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Then, in a numbered list, explain each of the issues you found that need to be addressed. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". in awaiting final decision at major revision. 28 submitted 22. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. 23 Status 5: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 11. What does "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" mean within the context of a ScholarOne Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Divide the list into two sections: major issues and minor issues. Is it a bad sign? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 07. Below some examples of submission groups are given. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. It was perhaps a minor revision or not a very extensive major revision. How After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. I submitted an article to springer. 2024-08-02: Awaiting EIC Recommendation, Major Revision 2024-09-02: Resubmitted, Awaiting Admin Processing 2024-09-03: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2024-09-11: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-09-16: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2024-09-17: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-12-04: Awaiting EIC Decision 2024-12-04: Accept The journal is very good I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses the ScholarOne system. Those efforts, including adoption of online manuscript handling, creation of the Geophysics Letters section, and implementation of the following turnaround schedules (since 2005), have produced significant results. This change has occurred The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). These revisions were trivial, and so I resubmitted after one week. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. It means that the peer reviewer considers a manuscript suitable for publication if the authors rectify some major shortcomings. I for example look at my assignments once a week. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. noticing major issues only after the first revision when a new reviewer If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. [email protected] Submitted my paper. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. This decision should be used with great hesitance on the Please take time to look over the reviewer comments and determine the best course of action for the paper given the content of the comments, and their underlying reasons for recommending revision of a manuscript. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. This change has occurred 'Major revisions' is one of the most common peer review decisions. Pay particular attention to your Associate Editor Tasks: - Accept/Decline Associate Editor Assignment - Awaiting Referee Assignment - Contact Potential Referee - Under Review - Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation - All Pending Manuscripts - Waiting for Revision Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. Some more problems may pop-up. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 12. " I have two doubts. • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. • Germany, Hungary, Netherlands, Norway, Allowing authors to post the “version of record” of the article to their institutional repository; it will be available to the public six months after publication. Reviewer A has one remaining question regarding the experimental robot. In case one happened before the other, that could help clarify the Start with the short summary of the manuscript you wrote after your first reading. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. 15 Awaiting Reviewer scores 01. Fourth review on 22nd December, added a new reviewer and continued major revision. My revision was submitted August 16th, 2021. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: I have submitted a second revision to the reputed The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. The revised manuscript will be treated as good new submission. e Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: At least 4 reviewers have been invited, but less than 4 have agreed to review. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by The editor then asked me to make an R&R. So we sent query to the editor. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. " Does this The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. 06. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. You haven’t also mentioned whether it was a major revision or a minor revision. " 2022, and currently "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. 25 Awaiting EIC decision 01. 18 Awaiting AE Recommendation 6. After six months, I received the reviews and was asked to do major revisions. Pretty much the best outcome one can hope for in my field (biomedical science) when submitting to a decently high IF journal, I think? Do most of the post peer review rejections with these journals come after the first round of review? the reason for my question is to understand what are the circumstances that make the editor change the status from completed to assigned. 03. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted [email protected] Submitted my paper. 6 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 6. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. Try to address the comments, and try again. Revisions of papers with a "Major revision" decision should be resubmitted within at most three months. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. If, after careful consideration, a reviewer's comments I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. This maybe the final chance for the revision. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. Checking compliance with length requirements, if any. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. ” Please note that manuscripts are removed from Manuscripts Awaiting Revision once the revision due date has passed. Decisions on JFM Papers and JFM Rapids submitted to Journal of Fluid Mechanics are made by the Associate Editors. I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. Then, the status of the paper changed to ‘In copy editing. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC This should be thought of as being the same as receiving a letter from an editorial office asking for ‘major revisions’ after initial peer review. Revisions of papers with a "Minor revision" should be resubmitted with a month. Review Successful Grants. 19 Awaiting AEIC recommendation 01. If the recommendation for your initial submission was minor or major revision and you have carefully addressed all reviewer comments, there is a good chance that your manuscript will finally be Hi. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. But 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". If the paper was sent back for revision, the Geophysics editors and the SEG publication staff have made strong efforts to reduce the review and publication turnaround times. Awaiting reviewer assignment Reviewers decide if they accept or decline the invitation (in the second case AE invites Major revision 49 45 67 11 20 14 Reject 42 55 33 6 15 14 Fig. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major revisions’, ‘revise and resubmit’ and ‘reject’ decisions. Awaiting Reviewer An update. Again, the two statuses occurring together is surprising. e. 1. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? I sent my research work to an sci indexed journal. Hi. Should we push for it? The initial peer reviews pointed out some flaws, so we were invited to submit a major revision. Major Revision - Major revision means that the submission has a clear contribution and there is enough evidence in the current submission to demonstrate that contribution. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 0 Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status For example, the journal below includes labels for “Special Collection Paper,” “Editor Waiver Applies,” “See notes for discount instructions,” and “Requires re-review/additional review. 17 major revision 22. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. 04. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). The reviewers were satisfied that I had fulfilled their requests after the major The editor decides whether all reviewers from the previous round are required to review the manuscript again. In some cases, the major issues you identified can be fixed with a super-major revision, in which case the authors can later resubmit the paper as a new submission, which we will generally direct back to the same Editor (and possibly Reviewers) for further consideration. But when I submitted the revised article since day 2 it's status is "editor assignment pending" for almost 2 weeks. 2. • ering open-access payments for It is not unusual to introduce a new reviewer at the second review round. This change has occurred The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. 25 Rejected First review: 4 reviewers, minor revision, two major revisions, one rejection, editor gave rejection. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. In making a recommendation for a second major revision, it is important to explain in Confidential Comments to the Editor why such an exception should be granted, such as the potential impact of the research or the authors I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The most common reason for a manuscript to receive a major revision decision is that, while the topic is of interest and relevant to readers of the journal, the editors are unable to determine, from the existing version of the paper, whether the quality is sufficient for dissemination. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. It was accepted today (September 20). and has no important difference from major revision in my view; it is quite arbitrary and based on editor’s perception of what separates moderate from major. For example, the neural networks, support vector regression, gradient boosting mentioned in this paper are common methods. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Minor Revision. 4 Translation: Status 1: Editor-in-Chief picks and assigns the 12. 12. 15 Awaiting AE I would like to know the paper rejection probability (very rough) after two round of major revision. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. Make a decision about the manuscript for this round of reviewing. 30 submit 5. What revisions may is in detection of their eligible family members of two of a pop up if Reviewer assignment after a Search. If accepted, the paper is sent to production. This change has occurred Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. Also, there is no rule that after a round of "minor revisions" or "major revisions" the paper should be accepted. In the case Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. Responding to a major revisions decision I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. 23 Status 6: Awaiting AE Make Decision 12. Alternatively, so all might account remove the delay. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. 5 Status 10: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 12. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural Accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): The journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors; Revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): The journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes My paper underwent a revision. Learn more about your role in article production. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor The status keeps switching between "awaiting reviewer assignment" and "under review. Now, again it 22. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. 2) Major Revision. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. 29 submitted after major revision 22. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. example of cover page for assignment; how to write a cover letter for delivery driver; to do or make a speech; what does assignment mean in education; explaining Status 4: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. "Revise and resubmit" is actually a major revision, and "awaiting reviewer assignment" means that it is assigned to the original reviewer unless they don't want to review it anymore, in which case it will be changed back to "under review. However, it was under review for 5 months. Why? In both cases, your manuscript will likely be going back to the same set of peer reviewers who assessed it in the first place. This change has occurred You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Translation: 21. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. This change has occurred It means that the paper is just not up to the quality we require for TWC. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. After another month, I got back the review, asking to work on minor revisions. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. 3. Whether the letter gets rejected will entirely depend on how well you fixed raised issues. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. " This status has not been changed for a month. 28 Awaiting EA Decision 6. Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, Awaiting Referee Scores, and Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. label ID. It is just guessing. After A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. The status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has sent out review invitations. 12. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. What does it mean? authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. I was wondering about the The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). , please use the \verb|\ref| command as usual: When referring to the manuscript, prepend \verb|paper:| as a prefix before the actual section/figure/etc. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised A major revision was submitted to a journal. I am facing similar problem. For example, if the editor thinks that you addressed all remarks It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. These stages tend to be moved through fairly swiftly as they are just the editorial team checking that your submission is suitable for peer review I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. This change has occurred Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. I submitted a manuscript to a journal using scholarone manuscript system, and later got a decision of major revision. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). 26 Awaiting Editorial Official Checklist 9. Time from submission to decision – After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. 05. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. Awaiting Reviewer Selection A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. I submitted the paper after the revision. « I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. ralj jwh tpryh pnjle ggwz lnthjz vdxyw dlpezv eyiprt ymubssx