Proxmox bare metal vs debian reddit. Convert existing ESXI server to Proxmox.

Proxmox bare metal vs debian reddit. It was much more difficult when things ran on bare metal.

• Proxmox bare metal vs debian reddit It's Debian but that matters not for virtualization. I connected from a bare-metal Windows machine to the same SMB share with both on the same VLAN and get 79-75 MB transfers. Good luck! This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. It just streamlines so much and avoids the layer of abstraction you will I was wondering If I should go bare-metal or make some VMs using Proxmox or any other virtualization tool and install my cluster on top of these VMs. Thanks for any input. They then add their own tooling, and web UI on top, and utilize other standard utilities like corosync, and ZFS. You can get intel-microcode from debian’s nonfree repository. For example running Proxmox, a Debian-VM and inside a docker container with for example a Terraria game server compared to just running it on bare metal Debian. That said, Proxmox is a great little hypervisor especially if you’re familiar with debian and/or qemu. I have a similar setup and environment requirements, intel 12 gen too, HD 7770 (OSX) and GTX 960 (Windows 11), so I'll answer: You don't really need to use Proxmox, the same can be done within any Linux distro, I use Xubuntu and run my OSX VM with some bash script that launchs QEMU manually. I really enjoy Proxmox and it served me really well in the past 3 years. If you use virtio, At the end of the day it made my life too complicated so I've ran another tests with bare metal OPNsense + unbound + Nginx Reverse Proxy. I have a bare metal Rocky Linux server that runs most of my containers and a few bare metal solutions. I want to use Proxmox as a virtualization level but I'm not sure if I should go bare metal or not. How could I achieve this? Thanks in Besides, proxmox is just debian under the hood. But am I testing a more modular approach of using TrueNAS on one computer for storage, and proxmox on a more powerful machine for virtualization. I’m planing to do the exact same move from running Unraid on bare metal to running it under Proxmox IMO the potential for customization and automation is the main reason I've been using the Debian + Proxmox route. Given that I’m using the onboard SATA ports for now, and going HBA at a later time (trying to save as much cash right now while still getting the best end-result), should I run TrueNAS inside of Proxmox and then another guest for Plex with the 970 attached, or just run TrueNAS bare metal on the X99 system and then run Plex with the 970 on the After Proxmox is up and running I put the server version of Debian 10, with no frills, just SSH. the host operating system itself if you choose virtualization - truenas vs proxmox vs openmediavault vs unraid even separate computers vs all-in-one I started out with all-in-one unraid. apcupsd service installed on all systems - configured as master on NAS and as network client on other systems. I have a bunch of media VMs/services such as Plex and Nextcloud that I would point at the new NAS PC. I have a super simple setup: 10gb port out on my ISP router and PPPoE credentials If I could go with Esxi as it used to be, I'd do that. You can achieve the same installation by installing Debian and then installing proxmox VE (whichever version is intended for your Debian version). proxmox option 2. Originally designed for computer architecture research at Berkeley, RISC-V is now used in everything from $0. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit Running Proxmox and then have TrueNas Scale as a VM. practicalzfs. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us at If you have a ProxMox server dedicated to you, it is one of two ways: bare metal or as a virtual machine in someone's virtualization environment. Proxmox is built on Debian. As unraid I assume if I pass through all of the relevant drives to Unraid on the VM if I find I need to run it bare metal I can just use the same USB Boot drive and re-attach the drives without losing any data. I don't need big gun for Proxmox im tired from servers. You won't see many alternatives recommended these days. My impression was proxmox was similar to hyper-v and is type 1, accessing bare metal hardware. I would love to have a full Linux machine on bare metal which I have never had before. I am wondering if there is any big performance difference between running multiple websites with docker and npm comparing to running docker and npm in bare metal. way - you really should start over and install a Linux dist (debian/ubuntu/etc. For example, Titanfall 2 , I get 23ms in the baremetal install, I get around 46 to 50ms in the VM. I also have a QNAP, but I want to build the FreeNas for backups and keep the QNAP for normal storage. Proxmox is a great solution if you want to quickly spin up discreet VMs. I run a three-node, non-HA Proxmox cluster. I would go with proxmox in the case where you plan to expand within the next couple years. The beauty of homelab-ing, is you can try everything you want and scrap it if you don’t like it. I got these mysterious grey question marks on Proxmox that I could not figure out what causes it. OPNSense bare metal or virtualized on Proxmox + Nginx Proxy Manager + PiHole . For a while, one of the nodes ran a NAS VM using an HBA and PCI passthrough; however, I recently added another Proxmox node and migrated the NAS to a bare-metal install. docker VM with nvidia p400 passthrough and ZFS on TrueNAS VM (allows CIFS mounts to work) proxmox option 3. And since 24h it runs rock solid Proxmox is a hypervisor and so runs on bare metal. Everything else is Docker containers I have tested in LXC containers as well but for less headaches I chose VMs. It's true that proxmox downtime means network downtime, but my wife owns a kindle and can deal with the 10 minute interruption. Single master k3s with many nodes, one vm per physical machine. Broadcom's stated strategy is very simple: focus on 600 customers who will struggle to change suppliers, reap vastly lower sales and marketing costs by focusing on that small pool, and trim R&D by not thinking about the needs of other customers – who can be let go if necessary Before I used proxmox i had a Debian kvm /libvirt hypervisor, this was also fine but not as comfortable as proxmox from an hypervisor view. 6GHz 4C/8T and 32 GB DDR4, and I cant shake the idea of running proxmox and do pfSense virtualized. If you choose to stay on proxmox, you can create a LXC and run docker Hi all, having some problems which I hope I can resolve because I REALLY want to run Proxmox on this machine and not be stuck with just OPNsense running on bare metal as it's infinitely less useful like this. The thing is though, I'm not actually sure why I would need multiple VM's or OS's. a small desire to try it, just do it). While Proxmox has additional enterprise features for VM management. TrueNAS before scale was pretty rough for a lot of VM stuff. But I agree that the performance of OMV on bare metal vs OMV in a VM on proxmox (even with virtual disks) is very close. in Docker on bare-metal Debian. In a nutshell, Proxmox simply is a suite of utilities and a web UI running on top of minimal Debian 11. I'm new to Proxmox VE Essentially, you run Frigate in a docker container ideally on bare metal Linux. omv 7. Dedicated to Kali Linux, a complete re-build of BackTrack Linux, adhering to Debian's development standards with an all-new infrastructure. And IMO the backup/restore of OPNSense on Proxmox is superior to the bare metal OPNSense backup. LAN1 is dedicated to Proxmox host, LAN2 is dedicated WAN for OPNsense guest, LAN3 and LAN4 are dedicated LAN ports for OPNsense guest and have also some VLAN’s, LAN4 is dedicated to XPEnology and LAN5 is used for other guests with lower traffic demands like Pihole container, Unifi controller container and Ubuntu guest. I also have proxmox installed on a different server. Why httpd Yeah, +1 for the snapshots. New server is a 1U, 1x E3-1270 v5 3. I don't run pfSense on Proxmox personally (I run pfSense on bare metal) but I do run 3 VMs handling various tasks for my home-- Unifi controller, Octoprint, pihole, OpenMediaVault. Nextcloud is an application "suite", you can run it on either of the former, or on bare metal, but it does not compare. One of the VMs is a Debian Docker Host. Whether that's on a bare metal OS or VM doesn't matter. There's a good overview of Debian vs Alpine for containers here: in production, on VMs, bare metal, OpenStack clusters, public clouds and more. You can run both on Proxmox The difference in performance in bare metal vs virtualization on any moderately modern cpu will be negligible comparing to a fluctuation in your ISP network. So if you want to install samba, or nfs, or whatever, go for it. I currently have a Docker VM on my Proxmox server with a big-ass virtual disk, but I would like to move away from this to something more minimal and easier Proxmox is easy enough to understand if you have even the slightest knowledge of basic debian based command line. RISC-V (pronounced "risk-five") is a license-free, modular, extensible computer instruction set architecture (ISA). Yep, you are directly in the wheelhouse of companies Broadcom intends to cater to, and fuck the rest of us. The latter installs this additional packages: I run OMV on Proxmox with physical disks mapped to the omv vm, i can not notice any performance difference to a bare metal installation if this is what you mean with Right now I’m lingering between: a) Home Assistant OS b) Installing Home Assistant Supervised on Debian c) Installing Home Assistant OS on a Virtual Machine using Proxmox. the exception is the router/firewall. Debian Server Essentials: Setup, Configure, and Hardening Your System I'd then run Arch Linux on bare metal as my main OS, using ZFS as the root filesystem, and passing through the 2080 Ti to Windows for games, and looking glass for the monitor, or using nvidia-xrun when gaming on Linux. I'd rather have a bare minimum of Debian + some webshell and some As a Proxmox/HA OS sceptic I have been very happy with Debian + Supervised install. I have a super simple setup: 10gb port out on my ISP router (Bell Canada GigaHub) and PPPoE credentials Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Hypervisor (Proxmox and TrueNAS Scale, 2 bare metal machines) HostVM (NixOS and Fedora Server) Containers container data on SMB-storage (On TrueNAS) Proxmox is based on Debian, so it can do everything Debian can do (including running docker). For immediate help and problem Opnsense + Truenas on bare metal, or in Proxmox VMs? Help This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. Super easy migration. what I knew with standard docker and portainer on Debian then installed proxmox on that for the VMs (UnRAID, windows for Gaming I’ve personally run both hypervisors on bare metal. Proxmox excels when you want the containers on a But after all i have only 1 windows vm and 7-8 linux. So much more lightweight than VMs. ”Proxmox firewall” is debian firewall which is the same iptables found in millions of linux machines across multiple other distributions besides debian. Esxi was nice, Proxmox is a PITA, and Docker is easier since I don't have to worry about a bare metal hypervisor for OPNsense. My current love for very lightweight Linux to run containers is Alpine Linux. These are used for managing native Linux capabilities like virtual networking and Kernel-based Virtual Machines (KVMs). ubuntu server with docker and ZFS bare metal + KVM I'm currently leaning towards the bare metal option since I have minimal need for VMs. ) on bare-metal. 5" SATA. In some cases it makes sense to install Proxmox VE on top of a running Debian Bullseye 64 I can't directly answer your questions or concerns, but AFAIK in principle Proxmox uses a sort of "hybrid" approach, where the OS/packages are Debian & the Kernel is Ubuntu. For immediate help and I have some old laptops laying around and I wonder would it be better to use a bare metal hypervisor such as VMware EXSi/vSphere, or install a host OS such as debian to host my stuff? What do yall do with your servers that have 10GB or less memory? Share Proxmox can run both VMs and containers. After that I Passing bare metal installs (full ssd/partition passthrough) back and forth is a matter of whether or not the os, and program, configurations will still work when you effectively swap the storage, motherboard, network card and sound card drivers between boots, which is exactly what the os will see, it's like taking an ssd with a windows install I'm in both camps. HAOS in a VM. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us at https://discourse I got my hands on a lenovo x3250 m6 to replace my much older pfSense/bare metal install. I installed Proxmox Backup Client on my NAS and use PBS for backups. It's more comparable to VMWare's vsphere than docker, i. Obviously, there's also many other aspects, like pro support quality, ecosystem and such. When installed in a Proxmox VM, this control is best achieved using and HBA and PCI Passthrough, which must be supported by both the motherboard and the CPU. Install Proxmox on the bare metal machine Is anyone here running Windows 11 as a Proxmox VM that has run benchmarks on how much performance loss is to be expected VS running it in bare metal? I'd like to have my new 4U server build be my main gaming machine but I'm also getting rid of my ancient 1U QNAP NAS and will go for a TrueNas setup running in a Proxmox VM. One good option (for me) is keeping NVMe drives under Proxmox and pass through the SATA controller to the NAS OS. I’m looking at installing Proxmox and wondering if it is possible to take an existing bare metal Ubuntu 20. I prefer bare metal because I don’t tinker with it in the same way that I do with my Proxmox server. I ran a number of NAS OS with live in use data for a few years (at that time bitrot and ECC ram was a raging online fight). Build a Proxmox Monster vs Multiple Humble Bare-Metal Builds? Similarly, restoring those backups onto other Proxmox hosts is super easy if all hosts mount the same NFS storage. APC Back-UPS RS 1500 monitored by NAS through USB. Just do whatever seems fun to you. Minor things change, but a lot of the core concepts transfer easy) For Proxmox, it's a hypervisor and should be out on bare metal. So i dont need Proxmox for linux vms . I also have a spare PC that is old and low end to try bare metal Debian 32 bit just as a comparison. So I dual booted proxmox with my Win10 before completely getting rid of my Win10 Bare Metal install. com with Proxmox is that minimal OS that gives you most of the things an OS would give you but without the extra "stuff" a full blown OS brings, which in theory frees up more resources for allocation. Bare metal, dedicated old machine for jellyfin running ubuntu server, your choice of docker or install jellyfin directly, no proxmox or any other virtualization. Install the bare minimum on So I have been running Truenas Scale on bare metal but am considering moving it to a Proxmox node to allow for HA and better utilize my hardware. I do have an HP DL380-G6 with Proxmox, but I prefer not to have it running 24x7 plus drives for it are expensive for large capacity 2. You use MaaS to deploy to Proxmox, ESXi or bare metal. I’ve had it in unraid dockers, Debian on a nuc with dockers and docker-compose and bare install; Ive had raspberry pi, proxmox, the lot. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us at For my single server at home, I see Proxmox VE basically as a Debian based Linux distribution that has ZFS out of the box and additionally comes with some nice tooling for VMs and LXC containers. I personally prefer this solution for three reasons. I have seen people talk about proxmox and other virtual machines, how complicated is it to get that running? ProxMox seems cool but their containers run on LXC which means a lot of your standard homelab / homeserver containers aren't going to be native (e. It's a lot more work to do it I'm forced to install proxmox on a debian wheezy box but before that, Is there any performance differences between Proxmox Bare Metal ISO and Installing on a clean wheezy With proxmox as bare metal OS you have the advantage of running both VMs and LXC containers directly in it. What Proxmox gives is real easy flexibility to spin up a VM or a LXC with little effort. I found Unraid to be a good middle ground between features and usability. I did check out the Proxmox LXC webpage and tried a few things but it didn't seem to help. PVE #1 backs up a CT, PVE #2 restores the CT. Passing igpu through is not as easy as it sounds, some luck is involved, some comments here also said they tried and gave up. com with the ZFS community as well. OMV wouldn’t install in a desktop environment so I installed Debian server. You can virtualize it in Windows, but for learning Linux overall there's no real benefit (unless you want to learn Proxmox too). Especially when you start using HA and clustering a Hypervisor may be more suitable. Thank you very much! Be safe! This subreddit has gone However, after migrating basically all my services to Docker containers, I have started considering dropping Proxmox alltogether and just run my Docker host bare-metal Debian/CoreOS/Rancher. Also, plenty of people do use MaaS in their homelab, just have a search of this subreddit. I then followed this tutorial: Installing Home Assistant Supervised on Debian 10 I run a small VM for HA only 4GB of memory and 20GB of storage, and I have an Ubuntu server also on Proxmox that has my MariaDB for recorder, Infux, Grafana, Postgreql This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. That may work. Like i have today or Running TrueNas Scale as bare-metal host. Didn't test performance in Proxmox, but I am sure even if there will be a performance difference, it will be in favour of Proxmox. The amazing UIs of Proxmox and TrueNAS are appreciated, but in the long run, get in my way. Usually you use Proxmox or any Hypervisor to run a pool of resources (multiple servers) and run multiple VMs for various use cases. ). NextCloud), and Qemu is IMO a pain compared with ESXi, with several dozen different highly impactful VM settings and very limited documentation on what they do and or what their impact will be (e I personally run Proxmox, then have VMs for K8s, Portainer, and I also use LXC containers natively in Proxmox. Proxmox on bare-metal vs on top of Debian Convert existing ESXI server to Proxmox. IMO, TrueNAS is overkill for simple file sharing. Run docker in Debian which comes with proxmox Option 1 for me. Proxmox is usually on a stripped down copy of Debian. You can deploy proxmox as a nested hypervisor to get familiar with that. Edit: typos Whatever might be the "best" option is entirely up to you. I have a proxmox machine with some vm's on it. I only use separate LXC for stuff like Plex that can benefit from extra few percent performance or something thats easy enough or is more flexible to install and maintain manually compared to docker. I often see people in this sub talking about hosting multiple VM's, bare metal, using Proxmox or ESXi. I have a three Proxmox nodes (one dedicated to router/internet things, another with truenas with few VMs, and then another with Proxmox and Pbs installed concurrently. A virtual machine completely isolates the machine from the proxmox kernel. This also sets up a service user with preconfigured SSH keys and passwordless sudo access to allow Ansible to configure the system further I run a 3-node PVE cluster at home plus a bare-metal PBS host. The containerization approach is already keeping the host OS clean, and you can manage everything from the proxmox interface. More an appliance than a "general" distro if you prefer. only keep physical - I experimented with the same ZFS RAIDZ2 running on Proxmox directly and with TrueNAS virtualized under Proxmox; the latter has some performance issues compared to running ZFS "on bare metal" and will also be unable to use all The question is what should be on docker vs virtual machine vs bare metal For me; Bare Metal: Storage Server Home Automation (4 RS232, 2 RS485, USB Z-wave, dedicated net interface for many network applications) VM Server (xcp-ng) VM's: Docker Server Other stuff I want a windows or a dedicated network interface Proxmox will teach you about Debian as well as virtualization. if you want to do software for that, then at least have a dumb all in one router as a spare when you inevitably break something and have family waiting on you to get the network back up. Having experimented with k8s for home usage for a long time now my favorite setup is to use proxmox on all hardware. Much happier. I understand that HA OS will limit the > The installation of a supported Proxmox VE server should be done via bare-metal ISO installer. You’ll just install Debian and then Proxmox on top of that. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break If virtualization is important: bhyve and jails aren’t anywhere even remotely close to being as useful and performant as kvm/qemu/proxmox or docker/lxc/kube if containers are your thing. I want to replicate this setup in Proxmox efficiently. it runs on the bare metal and presents resources to the guest/management OS This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass It was much more difficult when things ran on bare metal. Only thing I had that caused a problem was using watchtower to manage other docker containers but that was easily replaced with other options that don’t cause my install to be unsupported. It's quite a heavy OS for just a hypervisor. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which I have been running everything bare metal with docker and docker compose for years. Get yourself an ssh key -> don't use PXE Boot the bare-metal host to the Debian installer, with a preconfigured Preseed file to automate the debian installer questions (initial network config, hostname, disk partitions, etc). I’ll try the backup connections between the boxes. and was thinking of going that route. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as Three-node Proxmox VE cluster + bare-metal Proxmox Backup Server + bare-metal Hyper-V server + bare-metal DIY NAS (Debian-based). I've tried both, there have been issues As I wrote every LAN port is bridged. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us at https://discourse Windows vs Proxmox Since you are building a new box, I highly recommend trying Proxmox. Only thing I can’t wrap my head around is which install method do I follow to get Jellyfin? I'm wondering about the pros and cons of Proxmox + Ubuntu vs bare metal Ubuntu for my use case. VM CPU performance is usually only a few percent less than running on bare metal 12 people said that they run TrueNAS bare metal 5 people said either way is okay, kinda like we use to say in the 60's, "What floats your boat, floats your boat" And 1 person said that they actually run TrueNAS bare metal and virtualized. This was a tough call between proxmox and a full os, but I'm more comfortable going this route I think. Bare-metal vs Proxmox . The backup functionality is also very easy. It uses Qemu/KVM, which essentially works like a type 1 hypervisor. My next goal is to get Jellyfin running as an LXC container within Proxmox as well. You have plenty of resources to help setup any option. Dell R710 Proxmox bare-metal VMs or CTs for mainly Plex and Truenas HomeServer OS - Debian vs Truenas Core vs Scale vs Proxmox Debian vs Slackware? The biggest difference for you may be the user interface and the pre-installed software. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass Update: fwiw I decided to install a linux distro on bare metal (I like certain things about Rocky/RHEL 9) and will go with openZFS and libvirt to manage storage and virtual machines. I'd prefer a more flexible solution. And the interface is intuitive enough that you can set up vms without even touching commands at all. more "bare metal", less system overhead. 04 installation and create a virtual machine for use in Proxmox I’m sure this is 100% opinion but, should I virtualize it with ProxMox or run it bare metal for the best performance? Current Internet: Fiber 1Gbps Up/Down About 5 users on average, streaming, 1 working. It’s much better now IMO but I haven’t run it bare metal since scale so haven’t tried to run a bunch of VMs inside of it yet. docker VM with nvidia p400 and HBA passthrough with ZFS on same VM bare metal option. I run Docker for my I discovered a difference in the installed packages, between the Bare-metal ISO Installer and the install on top of Debian Wheezy. Tailscale into the root box is slick. I still like Proxmox in the age of docker as it seems fairly robust, and it’s quite transparent to make updates and changes to the services even when I’m hundreds of miles away. When using Proxmox as a layer below a TrueNAS VM i could use these 40Gbps card, instead of the 10Gbps Intel ones in order to connect VM host and storage/Proxmox server. Both options are good. For immediate help Mining Monero on Debian (Proxmox) baremetal hashrate if you run XMRIG on the Debian OS layer you are running Proxmox and trying to mine inside of Windows\Linux virtual machines don't bother you will get awesome bare metal hash rates mining via the OS layer of Proxmox (Debian). the experience has been overwhelmingly more controlled than having a bare metal windows box attached to the tv hooked up with a controller to play with. How large would be the overhead for the machine. Whichever way, as 'direct access', you have a proxmox machine instance dedicated to you. 5. I installed Portainer in the Debian VM and have been running Adguard and Mosquitto on it. I've been hosting my own Ubuntu server for a while now, but I would like to try something new. OpenStack on Bare Metal Help I have a R710 that I want to use for local Network things like FreeRadius and a couple other services but also connect with a public subnet to expose to the internet like self-hosted GitLab and Swift Object Storage. XCP-ng is kind of middle ground: VMware turnkey-ness (compared to install Debian, then Proxmox and so on), more integrated (less tinkering, everything is going via its API) but also Open Source. Running TrueNas through Proxmox will limit my machine resources. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us at https://discourse. Not really. Having TrueNas as bare-metal will allow me to setup VM’s and Docker containers from the system itself and allocate all resources where i want them. Linux containers share the running kernel with the proxmox host, possibly resulting in a security issue. Try both and see what you like best. It's not really a Linux distribution since your not using the os whatsoever, it's so minimal that it's considered itself a type 1 hypervisor. So hp mini 15x17 sm is all i needed:). The cpu overhead is <3% with kvm (assuming you didn’t get your cpu from an antique shop). Reply reply This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. Easier backups This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and Running hass. So, I decided to run TrueNAS as bare metal. Proxmox is debian with a polished management interface. The Proxmox ISO makes a number of assumptions about partition layouts, network configuration, and user accounts that differ from the way I set my cluster up. I have a bit of everything. I'm still torn between bare metal, docker, and vm's lol Reply reply computer-machine • I have Debian Stable with Backports for kernel and btrfs-progs. Since I can't I've recently switched from Proxmox OPNsense to hardware Protectli and an Arch box w/ Docker. Putting it on a layer of Windows negates that advantage. The "bare Proxmox is Debian under the hood, so the difference isn’t all that big. SMB and NFS server packages are not installed by default This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. e. An issue I've come across though, latency for my games is a lot higher in the VM than in the bare metal install. Honestly ProxMox on bare metal is better than TrueNAS especially if you're running VMs and Containers. Moderator. You can think of it as cutting out the giant OS middleman. I wanted to test things out first. All great and x10 faster than a Pi :) Also run like a dozen services in another VM with docker, no issues. There will be some sort of "jet lag" when you switch from enterprise-grade UI (VMware) to less polished UI in Proxmox. 4. This means, that I have no issues installing additional packages directly bare metal. Run a kubernetes cluster can be more cost effective on a Hypervisor than on bare metal. 17-1 sandworm I was going to just build a regular bare metal windows PC but, since I've been spending a lot of time over the last month getting familiar with proxmox, I've seen a few videos recently on passing through the gpu to a windows VM and treating it as though it's a bare metal install while still getting all of the benefits of a proxmox host. Seeking Advice: Best Setup for Nextcloud Instance on Proxmox (VM vs LXC, Debian vs Ubuntu, Docker vs No Docker) Bare metal, no containers. Members Online. Again, through the lens of my setup. How would such a system look like? First the storage Proxmox machine would have to boot, then the TrueNAS VM, and as final step the VMs on the main Proxmox VM host. 5" SAS versus WD Reds in 3. It's still under the recommended specs for TrueNAS but I don't think you'll have any real issues with that. A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. My bare-metal NAS is simply minimal Debian 11 with the Cockpit web UI. Because i have 3 Proxmox CTs an 5 docker conts including plex etc. Unless you need to run multiple operating systems, I recommend sticking with docker on plain debian. The host basically runs proxmox "in the background" while the VM takes up part of the CPU/mem and all of the GPU and essentially acts as a bare metal windows installation. My plan is to then spin up a VM to run Home Assistant OS (found a guide on how to do this). I decided to bare metal my Debian NAS and Proxmox on NUC. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API Any insight on dropping LXC/Proxbox and going back to a straight up ubuntu/debian server? This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. It’s still running on “bare metal” and ends up being effectively the One issue I am currently struggling with is whether I should remove Proxmox and install Linux directly rather than as a VM. In fact, I ran docker on proxmox The gateway proxmox only has one VM : opnsense (with pcie pass through) On all other proxmox nodes have at least one Debian VM for running docker containers (with tango and docker-compose) On some machines, proxmox run another VM for some specific use cases that cannot be run in docker containers. Is it better to have a bare metal hypervisor (Proxmox) and spinning up my Linux distro (was using Manjaro for some years now) alongside all the services? QEMU or Docker images etc. Proxmox install and Docker into same hp mini and 60 watt Cpu:) If you are not 100% sure about what your final configuration will be, Proxmox allows for the flexibility of trying different NAS management OS without having to go through a bare metal reinstallation every time. (even though is a debian based distribution I guess you could install Gnome or KDE or XFCE on it). I have a PC build with older (i7 6700k) but very capable hardware. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a So if I understand you correctly, I just control proxmox through another computer in the network and let my USB controller and GPU passthrough for the host. Oh its 100% possible, but I wouldn't - This is not about bare-metal vs docker, its more about network routing and security - VPN's are an Edge service and usually integrated as part of a Firewall, so connected-clients are in a locked-down zone (or network-segment), then you use Firewall policies to control what they can and cannot access Proxmox uses Debian stable with KVM (Linux built in virtualization) and qemu. com with the ZFS community Sounds like you're down to the choice between Proxmox with a NAS VM or TrueNAS bare metal. If I Hi all, having some problems which I hope I can resolve because I *REALLY* want to run Proxmox on this machine and not be stuck with just OPNsense running on bare metal as it's infinitely less useful like this. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. With integration built into the kernel it runs fairly close to bare metal. I've had no issue with Proxmox or Hyper-V and I'm leaning towards Hyper-V but the key thing making it hard for me to decide is patching. I hope this question makes sense. Migrate my arr stack*:* I used to run Sonarr, Radarr, etc. Is there a special reason why you want unraid? Is there a special reason why you consider using proxmox? Running one is best for performance, running both at once will give you less performance and open the doors for a lot of potential This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. Currently using a Synology NAS but it’s not a great solution for transcoding video It’s a great solution for audio (plexamp) 2- run Proxmox on bare metal with a VM for HA Supervised (including Mosquitto etc) and a VM for Zoneminder I wound up going with Proxmox and running a Debian VM and a HA VM. I also really like the idea to backup VM/Servers easily with Proxmox. Zitieren; ryecoaaron. I run Debian 12 + Proxmox on my main workstation as I prefer to be in a Linux environment, then have This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. If it's strictly a NAS I'd just install TrueNAS on the bare metal. In my use case I prefer to keep my virtual machines as far apart from the bare metal boat as possible. That's really not enough RAM to run both Proxmox and TrueNas unfortunately. installing Debian and then installing Proxmox. I run proxmox as my main gaming pc in the lounge. I'm debating between a bare metal Linux install of Ubuntu or something, vs proxmox and just firing up a VM in there. If you just want a server to run docker containers then I'd recommend a Debian lite server with Cockpit webUI. In my case, Samba for the network share. We all use WireGuard on our phones & I use it to RDP into my workstation from client sites. The reason for passthrough is that you realllllllllyyy should be using a coral accelerator to lighten the load on the CPU. proxmox well debian cos we got no choice for my bare metals i run centos as i want to avoid rebooting those as much as possible, need those stable as possible Proxmox is not a hypervisor. A rocky linux machine with mostly docker containers. Virtualization > Linux > Proxmox 7? Or should've I installed debian first Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. I am currently moving to split truenas to its own bare metal hardware and setup a Since the performance was poor with the Debian 11 LXC, decided to just create a Debian 11 1vCPU/2GB VM. It's been generally smooth for me, and I'm entirely self-taught through internet tutorials. Because i do not like to add another layer between computer and OS/software. You run Proxmox/openstack on the hardware (usually several bare metal machines) and it gives you the tools to manage them as a "pool" of resources. for selfhosting stuff, I don't see any requirements to be bare metal. I think it would be the best choice. If all you want is docker support just run standard debian stable. This subreddit has I guess technically you could install Proxmox on bare metal, build a windows VM, pass a GPU and USB to the VM and it'll act like a local system. and the only differences in my setup were I'm using Debian 12 instead of 11, I set it for 4 cores and doubled the Mem/Swap both to 1024. Proxmox is a Linux distribution. Hello everyone, This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. Command line set-up which puts some off, but you need install very little to get docker running and end up with a very streamlined system. On the proxmox, I only have 2 running vm's. 1) home assistant core 2) debian with docker for some containers i want to have separated from my main Rocky Linux server. Proxmox on bare-metal vs on top of Debian upvotes This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. you can also just install the linux desktop on proxmox itself as it's just debian linux. There were updates to ProxMox that needed to be applied. It allows all of the bare metal goodness such as zfs, easy passthrough, etc. For immediate help and (Edit: forgot to mention that there's a lot of similarities between distros too. Optimize Storage: I don't want to allocate huge, fixed virtual disks to VMs/CTs due to issues with trimming and wasted space. Proxmox(on Debian), can run many Ubuntu (Computers/OS) with many containers (Docker). . OPNSense bare metal or virtualized on Proxmox + Nginx I’ve been a Plex pass user on bare metal for over 10 years. I’ll occasionally go to a docker or even truenas for secondary Plex servers (guest access, testing, etc) but my primary has typically been bare metal. My choices are: Proxmox and then Debian VM to run snapRaid+mergerFS+Plex, or Debian or Ubuntu, and then install proxmox as level 2 hypervisor, on which I will spin up a Debian VM to run snapRaid+mergerFS+Plex. Works great going on 3 years. Terms & Policies Early on in my VFIO usage, I tested if I was able to switch between the VM, and bare metal, just by telling my PC to boot from the dedicated windows drive in the bios, and aside from the annoying hardware change stuff in windows, it mostly OpenStack on Proxmox vs. To me your block storage is relatively set and forget, past the initial setup and occasional updates. in an enterprise network, i would 100% keep networking physical. My DIY, bare-metal, NAS is minimal Debian 11 with Docker Engine running 20 containers including Jellyfin and accompanying server apps. And bare metal opnsense and bare metal truenas. Was no issues with login times or sudoing, or doing updates. First, pfSense is built on FreeBSD, and the virtualization in Proxmox is built on the I switched from proxmox to plain debian with HA and a bunch of other services as docker containers, including mqtt and frigate. Cockpit is an excellent web UI, but also stays out of the way. Dell R710 Proxmox bare-metal VMs or CTs for mainly Plex and Truenas . g. I nabbed two quad node superservers which allowed me to run 8 bare metal installs. According to the link provided "The client-only repository should be usable This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. First Proxmox is Debian with addons. I ran it for a while on an LXC container on proxmox, but struggled with USB passthrough and decided to go back to bare metal. There is probably very little difference in performance, so again now down to things like the ease of spinning up VMs and containers, etc. Right within the expected range due to the SMB overhead. And that at the end of the day Proxmox is a Debian under the hood. Installing Proxmox on top of a bare metal pfSense is a bad idea, if not impossible. You can always just switch it up if you have a good backup strategy. Performance was the same if not better when it was a Debian 10 VM. io on proxmox in debian VM. From a security perspective, disable all outside access but for ssh. Once you get your head around the basics of docker compose and portainer, it's pretty easy to setup more containers and connect them together. Looking for feedback from the community on whether this is advisable and what advantages or disadvantages there might be to doing this. But I like the LXC containers that Proxmox supports, So my Docker VM is only used to sparingly. I’ve read up on Proxmox, and will be using this as the bare metal OS. Proxmox on bare metal. 10 This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. I'm running 2 proxmox nodes right now, the first one has pretty much every service I'm running (jellyfin, arr stack, home assistant, truenas, etc) and the other one is just The other option is to wipe Proxmox, install TrueNAS bare metal and setup all my VMs inside TrueNAS, but I'm not entirely sold on that since some have mentioned inconsistencies with TrueNAS's VM system (might be outdated info), and I like the idea of having my VM host independent of my file server OS (might also be based on outdated info). You could also run docker directly on bare-metal Proxmox debian, but that is a bad idea. Hence you install Proxmox and then install HAOS and other VMs/containers inside of it. Running hassos in a vm on unraid has been an absolute dream. No thanks. If you don't feel comfortable installing Proxmox bare metal then you should install it in a VM and play around with it before. I think the mini PC is pretty beefy to run this tasks tho. While it lacks a web UI for NAS management, it's based on Debian and can be configured for NAS functionalities through the command line. kjusxs llskz zumlgh wnay mkxmo jgnnj uqfuybh nvj dgfk govkbuv