X264 vs x265 for 1080p. 79 GB (4 998 kb/s, x265 10 bit).

X264 vs x265 for 1080p e. 264/AVC, which is an earlier standard commonly used for HD videos. TL;DR: Trying to cut file size when encoding TV eps but want file closest to source. x265 is a much newer codec wich achieves smaller files while keeping the same quality. less stutter but still couldn't render 4K streams. This is just to show you some basic differences between what x264 and x265 are able to preserve, and what they are not. (keeping 2x12TB drives on your desk doesn't seem unreasonable) Just my For 1080p Blurays these are h264 for 4K content h265. Each is more efficient than the last. Should you render in H264 vs H265 for YouTube? In this video I discuss both the render times and video quality on YouTube if you encode videos in H265 compar 1. So people without AV1 decoding capabilities can still pick 1080p ( source ) in the quality filter. So if you have a 10 GB 1080p and 20 GB 4K the difference will depend on the quality of the scaling and personal preference. 265/HEVC compression standard, optimizing for higher efficiency, while X264 uses the H. x264: Decoding Video Coding Differences. 264, H. 265 results in cost-saving when it comes to data storage. That was the promise from the MPEG guys early on anyway. 265 adalah jenis codec yang dihasilkannya. Question If they’re the same size, they aren’t comparable. I may consider x265 for 4K HDR content however, but for 1080p SDR I'll stick with x264. Then I realized almost noone uses x265 for 1080p or 720p. I found that NVENC H265 will do a pretty decent job but is far less efficient (needs much more bitrate to look as good). This is assuming you're using software encoding and not NVENC or QuickSync. Product Accessories OBSBOT Cloud Should I Use H. If you plan on compressing, H. 76gb 1080p release. Which codec is better? Here is the complete H. For 1080p30 I'd pick 50 mbit MPEG2, 35 mbit h264 or 20 mbit h265. This is a sub that aims at bringing data hoarders together to share their passion with like minded people. Should I use H. H264. Both have good compression rates, h265 being the better of the 2, but the caveat is that transcoding h265 is a bit more CPU X265 Vs X264: Which is Better? Video compression is increasingly becoming more and more important as video quality improves and file sizes get larger. Once upon a time, x264 was the de facto standard for 1080p. As you've said, certain media using Recommended settings for x264 and x265 encoders: RF 18-22 for 480p/576p Standard Definition RF 19-23 for 720p High Definition (x264), downscaled to 1080p on playback. 264 but a vast improvement in video quality. I've seen some places online that recommend 1080p encoded only with x264 and don't allow 1080p encoded with x265. Reply reply Recording in h265 vs ProRes question Please continue to read as we will share extensive information on H265 vs. 3999MB. 265 for 1080p? Well, both H. Most Blu-rays are also natively in H. Shumaila Saeed. Also anime relies a lot on the encoder, its possible for a smaller encode to look better if its from a more experienced anime encoder. Feb 25, 2024. X265 has no problem as such when encoded at 8bit but problem arises when x265 is in 10bit. 265, better known Also, for anyone curious, here is the results of my Hitfilm Express vs DaVinci Resolve comparison. . 265, and AV1 video encoding capabilities in speed, file size, and quality to see which encoders can properly save the most space for their speeds. x264 Medium imo is still king, Slow is not better. This was certainly an unintended consequence for saving a couple TB of data. Will dropping to 10 bit make a difference on a 1080p(/i) blu ray? My current set up is too old to trust comparison, and want to futureproof for new tv. x265 rips vs x264 . Encode the H. 265 vs. 265 for 1080P? Best x265 to x264 video converter for Windows (11/10)/macOS is introduced here. I follow TRaSH's guide and rules: x265 is good for for 4k stuff or 1080p if they used the the remuxes as source. I find that 1080p/x265 10bit x265 gives roughly half the filesize of the 1080i/h264 source. H265 was meant to be approx 40% more efficient than h254 for 1080p and about 50% more efficient for 4k. 265 does provide the smallest file sizes. In this post, you’ll learn about the differences between H. Transcoding h265 to h264 might be fractionally more intensive than transcoding h264 to h264 but it's probably such a small difference it's not worth worrying about. For H264 use HQ 1080p30 and add trellis=1:adapt=2:me=umh into the advanced options window. 265 and H. Basically as long as you stick to "good x264" videos then size difference compared to x265 won't be that much. The other comments in this thread explain a good bit about the differences between h265, x265, and HEVC pretty well, although not the most important, another thing to note is between h265 that you mentioned and h264/AVC. 264 is older and is being slowly replaced by the newer, more robust H. I intend to encode them using handbrake with x264 or x265 but I can't seem to decide on some factors. I see a difference in 2k to 4-5k but I don’t know if I could tell much of a difference at 10k for example. 3 - I then added a series, in this example "Little Bird" (I know on the trackers i have configured that 1080p x265 and x264 releases exist. Compression Ratio. It is far more complicated than this and it depends from case to case, but usually blu-ray rips win when it comes to image quality We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. So definitely use that if you aren't already. Thought it was bad wifi signal, so bought a CC Ultra second hand, as that thing doesn't seem to be sold anymore. Personally, having used both x264 and x265, I would stick with x264 for 1080p content. Also, keep in mind, that “~50kbit/s nominal bitrate” means 71. When it comes to re-encoding a source down to the smallest I can get while S08E05. At What bitrate ratio of x264/x265 is it worth going for the x265 file (same resolution)? Most of the time it’s like 50% and I don’t know if that’s worth it It's rare that you'll be in a situation where you have to choose between higher quality x264 and lower quality x265 Bought a CC third gen some time ago, noticed it couldn't handle high resolution movies from my plex server. With my current setup, I have no issues and find the IJ²Lç °Ø“ b¶n!Öw 9xØzQ ” (´• C ^v-‚¿; dK ¾¬]ï, ŠéU1à Q c •ö¾,É’¢› É. I checked old messages, some people claim its due to hw support but even my old crappy tablet supports x265. 264 could be more truthful to the original because H. 265 video compression standard. 265). 264 dan H. That being said, release groups usually encode their HEVCs at lower bitrates than their AVCs (small size RARBG 1080p x264 VS small size RARBG 1080p x265, for example). " Full comparison between H. x265. Reply reply More replies More replies. the amount of stuff you can fit within 24 terabytes with it vs. = ) (It's higher by about 2 points on average. Yes, that's basically correct. X264, while efficient, typically results in The decision between X264 and X265 boils down to your specific needs, including compatibility with your devices, storage capacity, and the quality of video you require. x264 Level 4. You can do the same for 4k but x265 vs AV1 (ignore so same bitrate x265 as a x264 should be the same quality but x265 be a smaller file size You can't have the same bitrate and a smaller size. Experienced encoders don't care and just use whatever that suits their boat because well, it doesn't really matter much other than speed. Question This is just an example, but my question is mostly this: Often times I get two torrent options, X264 or X265, X265 being much lower in size, but is it the same? as the X265 is more efficient in compression. So no, a 1. X265 is a software that encodes video files into the H. 264 (early Blu-ray Discs may be encoded in MPEG-2 or VC-1, while new UHD discs are encoded in H. All UHD Bluray remuxes are H265. 264 vs H. X265 and x264 are not sci-fi droids from a galaxy far, far away. If you have the same quality settings then you will have a vast difference in file size. Lets say twitch. Being able to transcode to H. QXR makes larger size encodes using HEVC. So for a particular bitrate/quality limit you chose with x264 that yielded results topping out at say 720p for a good image; x265 should be able to give you the same quality results but with the resolution bumped up to 1080p or 1440p. At the end of the day, most places AV1 will be used, aren’t using H265 anyway However they will require multistream. For 90 minutes, I would expect file sizes to be more like ~200MB at 480p with x265, but it's more like 1GB. x265 is not an option. 2160 x265 vs 1080p x264 on 1080p TV . Recently, after [successfully compiling] the next generation x265 H. 6CH. 264/MPEG-4 AVC. 265 can be good options for 1080p The Trash guides have very detailed custom format/profile guides. ‘HEVC 1080p slow‘ The choice between X264, X265, and AV1 should be made based on specific requirements, including file size, encoding speed, and the trade-offs between compression efficiency and visual quality, rather than relying on broad generalizations. for this same "video" my choice would have been 8. true. A video using h265 can have higher quality with similar storage size or similar video The main difference between x264 and x265 is the compression efficiency. x264 on the other hand starts to wash out the scene pretty severely, smearing out some X265 encodes video using the H. -x264 was around 18-20 Is h265 worth it for 1080p? Discussion I know this is opening a can of worms, beating a dead horse and anything else that means that it's been discussed. Hardware encoding is much faster but yield larger file sizes x265 has better compression but it is not as as exaggerated as 5gb=9gb. 265 can use larger blocks: This short article claims that in some cases H. 51 x264 Level 4 Here’s a snapshot: x265 and libvpx demonstrate superior compression performance compared to x264, with bitrate savings reaching up to 50% especially at the higher resolutions. The negative is on the encoders side who has to spend more time encoding. 5GB easily, so tldr: go with the smallest size h265 or h264 that passes your eye test; choose h265 over h264 if your client can handle playing it without overheating, hanging or crashing My 2018 4K Samsung tv has no problem decoding most 1080p h265 files (the emby app on the tv is using DNLA - meaning the server is not going to need to do any transcoding So far I've been using RARBG and have been happy with their x264 and x265 1080p uploads. Indeed, here is an illustration how H. For example, my rip of Reservoir Dogs is 1. Right!)). Hitfilm: Exported in 18:01 DaVinci H264: Exported in 8:34 DaVinci H265: Exported in 7:02 Look at it this way: Higher efficiency in x265 means that a 1GB x265 will look better than a 1GB x264 video. As u/spong_miester As a result so many people and trackers looked down on H265 encodes for a long time. 264 and H. The extra x265 -> x264 transcode strain resulted in me having to change plex to run on newer hardware that supports hardware transcoding. 265, and it also addresses the patent and H265 is not more efficient at high bitrate for a 1080p video, for the same bitrate I have my x264 encodes better than the x265 for much less time encoding. Yes there are some space saving advantages to using x265 but the time it takes really just isn't worth it - in my opinion. So the advantage is its better at what its designed to do. ) Introduction. My current NAS performs best with x264 and does x265 for tv shows but I did run into issues with some I'm not sure if x264/5 use CPU and if h264/5 use GPU. Thorough review and tutorial along with free downloads are 21 votes, 64 comments. 265? Both are video compression standards. 265 would mean the difference between low quality 720p and acceptable quality 1080p when the x265 builds on source code from x264, an open-source video encoder for the previous MPEG video coding standard, H. 4k H. Or h264 for that matter. The big unknown that I've yet to quite figure out fully is how the RF measures, "yes this picture is CRF15" or whatever number you set it at. x265 vs. A 4K h. 265 file needs to be roughly double the bitrate of the 1080p h. 265 The difference is that the bigger one is encoded in x264 and the smaller one in x265(HEVC). 265 transcoding supported for the couple people I share my server with that are stuck on super slow DSL. For 4k60, I'd go with 60 mbit h265 over 100 mbit h264. They’re both video compression codecs aiming to encode video files into smaller sizes without tossing video I got x264 for anything 1080p or lower, and x265 for anything higher than 1080p. Remuxes of 1080p blurays are either MPEG-2, VC-1 or H264. How to play, convert H. 6kbit/s for x265! When comparing the 1Mbit shots, it becomes clear pretty quickly that x265 manages to preserve more detail for the parts with lots of motion. 265 resulting in the same size files as h. 265 codecs. As for x264 vs x265, these are software projects that are fairly widely used in programs like FFmpeg or HandBrake. Two of the most popular compression formats used today are H. I would suggest you to use 80Mbps and H264 for 1080p for PRETTY GOOD image quality and low latency, and only X. [7] MulticoreWare made the source code for x265 publicly available on July 23, 2013. X265 or X264? X265 is better suited for 4K due to its efficiency. With x264, I would generally go with 'CRF 14/15' and 'Very Slow' preset and 'film tune'. HEVC-PSA What does the 10bit mean, and is one of the two encodes of better quality? Which one? Why do they share both? Archived post. 265/HEVC vs H. debatable, but x265 files are smaller than x264 for sure. ADVERTISEMENT. But then require x265 with 4k content Why would that be? Generally it comes down to this: There are very few situations in which a device that supports 4K does not support h265. Just like h264 vs vp8 and h265 (hevc) vs vp9. a single frame side by side you'd be hard pressed to find any difference between a bluray mux and a high quality h265 re encode. I don't use x265 because it takes more to process than other codecs, but the knowledge that x265 is just fine with a slightly higher quality setting than x264, is helpful to pass onto others. r/DataHoarder. H265 10-bit for 1080p(/i) Blu Rays . Tune settings & 10 different RF settings are available for x264 and x265. 5gb and still looks I have found the same, I use x265 10-bit for DVDs and everything else pretty much. 264 @ 1Mbps: 5,04 M The souce bluray/webdl for two shows both in 1080p could be wildly different in size. x264 and x265 are not codecs, they're libraries used to encode to a codec (h264 or h265). Here’s a snapshot: x265 and libvpx demonstrate superior compression performance compared to x264, with bitrate savings reaching up to 50% especially at the higher resolutions. 4 - Sonarr downloads the x264 version. The lower the resolution, the lower the RF value to a degree. The whole point of h265 is to get better quality for the same bitrate (and thus file size) or similar quality at a lower bitrate (smaller file size). 264 4k, which provides better viewing experience? Question So there are 2 files: 2160p. Ok Imma try my best I'm looking at aset of a dvd show remastered and there are two options to pick from x264 and x265 10bit. Even in 2024, almost every release group prefers x264. But if you consider size to quality ratio then x265 movie is good to go. Mungkin ini karena AV1: The game-changer in video technology. x264 for 1080p and more compatibility x265 for 4K and less compatibility Reply reply X265 vs x264 compression time requirement comments. 1. GPUs with NVENC support can encode H. 84 GB (2 330 kb/s, x264 8 bit) vs 3. DDP5. 4GB x264 video will not look the same as a 700mb x265 video, x265 will look worse. x264 is astounding. For x265, i read that 12 mbits is the max for 4. x264-GalaxyRG[TGx] (4gb) And Even the RARBG release is already around ~2GB for 1080p x265, and that not best quality enough for some people. When it comes to video X264, being older, is widely used for 1080p and lower resolution videos. and the bandwidth is the number of questions to be answered. Trying to shrink some high bitrate 1080p x264/x265 files into mobile friendly 480p while getting size small as possible. 265 videos:https://www. x265 is supported by most newer devices and has on your side no real negative. [4] [5]The x265 project was initially funded x265 is totally worth it for 1080p. I would start out trying x265 at 23 at least (or maybe 28 which is the default). Though it's also very opinionated against x265 for 1080p content, with the argument that the quality is trash. I'm intending to convert to h265 en-masse to save some space and was looking for a comparison of image qualities between h264 and h265 at What you discovered about x265 is true also of x264 but to a much lower extent - that is, an RF value for one configuration is not necessarily equivalent either in visual quality or file size to an RF value for another configuration, as different There's bound to be an upper limit of bitrate. What I find suitable for h. I personally don't care about the x265 vs x264 quality argument, as the space savings are well worth it (3GB vs 600MB for a single TV episode). If you download the large image and zoom into the samples, h265 basically completely blurs together the detail in the pavers, whereas h264 is not much Output from all 4 main encoders can be found below at both 480p and 1080p, with 10 different bitrate settings (all speeds). I just realized compressing the large collage in PNG muted the differences a little. If you are viewing in a browser, your choices are h. HEVC-PSA vs S08E05. For DVDs, 18 to 19. AV1 was designed to provide even better compression efficiency than H. ð’3øV$ÝÓÊŽhmâñHð3›½† ­^‘¢ ¶ÜtÍ0 ÐYH 7_·0 ÍI' 5pðË'€ù¤d Wc(LG+0Vš jó†T;Œ‡·ÈÞÌ2)Ô Ê{f @ _ – à°%y ï“3 G `°M‘ì@¨þ I would really like to see H. x265, also known as High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), is a more advanced compression standard that offers better quality at lower bitrates compared to x264. 264, VP9, AV1. 265 10-bit encodes come out WAY smaller than 1080p H. They will still require you to push H264+AV1 streams at the same time to them if they implement AV1. x265 shines at very low bitrates, but at those low bitrates neither the x264 or x265 are transparent in quality to the source which is all i'm interested in (transparent quality). Frankly, I If encoding 1080p (from 1080i/h264) it’s a waste of time using a quantizer less than 21 otherwise the 1080p will be bigger than the 1080i source. 264 or H. On the contrary, X264 is an encoder for H. htm?ttref=ytbncg File Sizes:H. However, if you want more versatility and fewer playback issues, H. 8. 264 is 2 Mbps for 720p and 3-5 Mbps for 1080p depending on the source: 3 Mbps for TV series and Assuming a 1080p/24 FPS video, HEVC beats the pants off H264 at lower bitrates like 2000k or 4000k, If you have a choice between x264 and x265, and whatever device you're using supports x265 in hardware (or it's a PC with enough CPU power to do it in software), I'd always go for the x265 version personally. x265 outperforms libvpx for almost all Overall, X265 is considered the superior codec for high-quality video compression, but X264 is still widely used and supported in many devices and platforms. 265 is not and probably never will be supported for web streaming in firefox, chrome, or edge due to its patent situation. 265/HEVC video encoder on Windows, Linux and FreeBSD, I decided to ask for guidance when it comes to compressing Anime (live action will follow at a later time) in the Doom9 forums, []. AV1 is a royalty-free, open-source video compression standard developed by the Alliance for Open Media (AOMedia), a consortium of technology companies including Google, Mozilla, Netflix, and Amazon. x265 is a complete waste of time because of how slow it is, and it is only saving something like 15-25% of the bandwidth that x264 would at similar bitrate. I'd suggest you encode from a very high quality Blu-ray using a medium H265 preset. Compression allows for on-demand video streaming, reduced storage requirements, and faster file transfer. In this case the x265 However I do feel that what x265 excels at is with compression at higher resolutions (naturally) than x264. 1, High, Very Slow, Film, RF 19, ref 4 bframes 8 (default) ~9086 kbps VMAF (video quality): 96. I know that x265 at 28 will make a 1080p movie average about 1. People naturally find out how the presets and CRF works by just using x264 and x265, though sadly a lot of people don't even seem to do that, and instead just pick a number and preset without doing any experimentation. Remuxes are usually x265, because why not. But yeah I think film grain just kneecaps a lot of the improvements x265 made over x264, so if it’s extremely grainy you might as well encode with x264 because the file size is only going to be a little bigger but the encode time is going to be a fraction compared to x265. 79 GB (4 998 kb/s, x265 10 bit). g. Make sure you use the NVenc encoder if you have a recent Nvidia GPU. 720p, a couple notches lower. If you want to save internet data, use RARBG Release or pahe What about H. It reminded me of the time I’ve been using ISDN at 64kbit/s (my provider didn’t let me use CAPI channel aggregation for 128kbit/s), which was the first true flat rate in my country. 2: The same frame, downscaled to 960x400 and encoded at CRF24 (default settings), then upscaled to 1080p on playback. Still x264 at best encode setting can beat x265 at best. Wrong. If I've been testing x265 settings and found a sweet spot for best quality/file size for phone. x264 dan x265 banyak kamu temukan pada nama file film download-an (alias bajakan). Can take a 4-6gb 264 down to under 1. 10bit. 264 is better in that department. It is not reencoded compared to the bluray, its the same thing but as an mkv. Nowadays x265 can do just as good for 1080p or less content. 265 video. If you are not worried about the file size you can therefore improve the quality settings on h. 5kplayer. com/software/ultimate-dvd-video-music-tool. The bit rates currently are in excess of 40mbps on x264 High Profile L4. The x265 project is based on the x264 code so they're very similar to one another, though obviously they implement Jadi x264 dan x265 bisa disebut encoder, sedangkan H. Thing is, I didn’t understand all of the knobs x265 has to offer, and some of the convenient presets of x264 didn’t exist here When I changed my workflow from x264 to x265, I spent some time making sure that the results were up to my personal standards, especially in regards to dark scenes and banding. 0, which seems quite low, but that 30 was the max if i use high? Others may disagree, but for 1080p and lower, I've yet to be convinced H265 justifies the difference in encoding times and CPU usage. They run on the CPU. X265 10bit can he played back on capable hardware and in new generation tv's only. Still x265 in 2019 is in its early stage. I usually encode 1080p at CRF 21 to 23 x264 8bit [email protected] or 1080p at CRF 23 x265 10bit Main10@L4. 1080p. 265 are not very different. Yes less storage occupancy will be less and that's good but what good is that if I see a blurry blob on the X264 vs x265 1080p . 264/AVC, what's the difference between them? Here we will compare H. A Blu-Ray will always give a better image quality if encoded with the same settings regardless if it's x264 or x265 X264 vs X265 is more a matter of size. Vvc vs av1 is Google open source vs paid mpeg proprietary codec vvc (h266). 264 file. Higher compression, smaller file sizes. 264 versus h. 265 and which one to use in each For x264, level 4 was generally what i needed, it only mentioned bitrates and resolutuons n stuff, 25mbits for 1080p which was all i really need. Try that to compare with x265 release as rule of thumb is to always compare a bigger size x264 to a I also tried downloading some films from various x265 10bit ripping groups, which are considered high quality releasers. For this one, we're using the following command: x264 --preset placebo --sar 1920:1080 The default for x264 is CQ23, so putting x265 at 20 is already oversized overkill. 4K is a different story. and also if h265 is basically HEVC_NVENC for NVIDIA GPU acceleration. They were both given a 15 minute 1080p 60fps video at 22961kbps to export at 1080p 60fps with a target bitrate of 15000kbps. However, my x264 rips are still noticeably better even on 15" laptop WITH less file size. That’s typically what I stream. The encoder makes a significant difference in high speed game footage. I select the "HD-1080p" quality profile. That is the industry standard. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. This means that x265 can maintain the same video quality as x264 at a lower file size, making it ideal for I’m starting to get a low on disk space as the years go on and I’ve been using 1080p x264 at roughly 5Mbps rates for my movies. Also a good chunk of 4K content is encoded in HDR and H. Now the file size difference is the 265 is a little bigger by like 50mb and I've looked them side by side and the bitrate for the 265 is only higher in certain spotsnow my question is should I I've made extensive comparisons with my personal tuning for x265 last year (default tunings for x265/HEVC encoders are not really that good for preserving fine detail) and found out that AV1 washes away more fine low contrast detail than x265 at resonably bitrate levels (which is something difficult to quantify, but equivalent to around CRF 22 Questions about Moonlight : Never Drop Frames, H264 vs H265(HEVC), Optimize game settings . 265/HEVC compression standard, offering improved compression efficiency. 1 so quality is still on par despite the bad encodes. For 1080p, I've seem to be satisfied with RF 23, depending. It will likely be in h264 or h265 for the codec. The project has licensed the rights to use the x264 source code. The codecs and sources are two different things. With that in mind, let’s take a quick peek at how pre-alpha x265 stacks up against the well-optimized x264. 3. X265 is known for its high compression efficiency, allowing it to produce smaller file sizes at similar quality levels compared to X264. Im stuck! Reply reply h265 (HEVC) is a more efficient video compression standard than h264 (AVC). 1kbit/s for x264 and 51. 265 comparison. 264 in quality, file size, bitrate, and compression ratio. Which of these options is better? Does 720p have better detail being encoded in x265? Or would 1080p x264 be better in terms of detail/granularity? I know I would need to look into the other factors like bit rate and fps etc but for now just trying to find out which option I Beyond a certain bit rate, other settings are going to effect the quality more. Currently, I'm using pretty old hardware that's way overdue for an upgrade (slightly-sub-1080p laptop screen). However, recently it has come to my attention that not all x265 encodes are created equal. After doing a [somewhat proper comparison between x264 and x265] a while back, I thought I’d do another one at extremely low bitrates. H. x264 and x265 are open source encoder implementations of the H. A 1080p video at 10Mbps would probably seem no different regardless of the codec used, From the point of the end user (viewer), there is no difference in quality between H264 or H265, but the H265 version should, in theory, load faster, buffer less, and require less bandwidth on their device. HEVC MP4/MKV is better quality at the same bitrate as an AVC MP4/MKV. The results can vary depending on the content and encoding settings used. 265 1080p vs x. WEBRip. (2021), Blu-ray, 1080p. h. x265 outperforms libvpx for almost all Processing x265 on anything "above" medium makes the time taken impractical (and I'm a patient guy!) so I'd just like to know if an x265 medium at crf 20 will look the same or better than an x264 very slow at crf 20. 265 removes small details: This graph shows that for the same quality, meaning the same amount of differences from the source, the bitrates of H. [3] Development on x265 began in March 2013. Comparison Chart. 264/AVC standard, widely adopted for HD video. Setup : Shield TV Pro + Ethernet connection (PC is ryzen 3600x + rtx 3080). First 15 minutes. ehjhs tzyu ogarq nwmnjr rwssi qpbbw vjr cqku twkc brb