• THE WIND RISES

      Lightweight desktop environment reddit. I am a new Linux user.



      • Lightweight desktop environment reddit Some packages are called desktop environments because they implement many of the components a user might expect, whereas packages like i3 are more accurately called a wm because that's the part of the desktop it implements, and users will often install more components. All posts about Linux, open source, Linux gaming, hardware and so on can be posted… This always makes a mess out of desktop widgets/desktop icons. What's the general spectrum? I've heard good things from xfce for lightweight purposes, I've seen pretty ones like KDE Plasma on Debian, Cinammon is also popular on many distros like Mint. Download the installation . some may prefer lightweight stuff like xfce and i can see why but i prefer the all in one package. For older hardware, lighter environments are snappier, XFCE (Xubuntu-desktop), Mate, Cinnamon, etc. Can anyone help me? The Lightweight Desktop Environment is the product of the merge between the LXDE-Qt and the Razor-qt projects: A lightweight, modular, blazing-fast and user-friendly desktop environment. 6 megabytes in size. x. openbox which is used in LXDE). Maybe you want to mess with mounts or other things before you launch the desktop as well. Hopefully, the experience will smooth out for other people and other configurations Basically trying to find a lightweight Ubuntu compliant desktop environment with the following: Lighter weight than Gnome Work-spaces Move and resize windows from the keyboard (left, right, split, bottom, top, upper left, upper right, etc. Runs incredibly fast off of a persistent USB pendrive. I know the packages are outdated. gnome. Light on the LXQt is a lightweight desktop environment based on the Qt toolkit. And there are shell programs that allow you to surf the web, view PDFs and play music as well. Gnome should be pretty reliable, but I switched to KDE because of some design chooses made in Gnome shell 2. What these old netbooks need is a very stripped down desktop environment, or window manager. Members Online On an Intel iGPU laptop, an AMD iGPU laptop, and an AMD dGPU desktop, KDE Wayland on Fedora is pretty solid for me. I tend to prefer a minimalist desktop experience and tiling WMs seems to provide that. It's pretty quick, pretty low on resources and looks pretty good in my opinion. Something a little closer to lightweight would be like Sway. Members Online That’s a bummer. Recommend me a DE that is lightweight but also with modern user interface. Sway may be better than others as it's Wayland rather than X11. Verify the download according to the distro provider's instructions. kde. Trinity Desktop. ADD to that WM various tools for file management, graphics management, and system management, and you come up with a desktop environment. I am switching debian. From there you can start a desktop environment if you want to. Then: sudo apt install slick-greeter budgie-desktop gnome-terminal nautilus arc-theme papirus-icon-theme firefox-esr Fastest booting lightweight distros with a desktop environment? (Not sure if this belongs here, or in r/linux , so please let me know if I need to post over there instead!) I need to know which distro, out of the box, you think will boot the fastest to a full DE that can run FireFox. Pick a desktop environment, download and install the ISO for that, done. e. xfce4-goodies: This is a collection of additional software and plugins for XFCE that enhances its functionality. I want Pop_OS for the superior, baked in Nvidia GPU support…but I’m not a huge fan of Gnome. LXDE is lightweight and it comes default on the "Lubuntu" spin of Ubuntu. i3wm isn't the best for eye-candy, but it absolutely blows the others out of the water in terms of workflow efficiency and resource usage. It is the result of the merge between the LXDE-Qt and the Razor-qt projects. Components are; i5-10400, GTX1080, 16GB 3600Mhz CL18 RAM, 1TB 970 Evo Plus, 250GB Team MP34 NVMe. Linux Mint is also involved in the development of MATE, a classic desktop environment which is the continuation of GNOME 2, Linux Mint’s default desktop between 2006 and 2011. Its good to have just in case. I read that V-Sync doesn't exist in X, but Gnome/KDE have resolved the screen tearing issue as well as some other desktop environments. I am going for a minimal install. Unlike LXQt, you will find a lot of major Linux distributions support XFCE Posted by u/[Deleted Account] - 1 vote and 2 comments I am looking for the best lightweight desktop environment to go with Fedora that would work well with my 4k display. Lightweight or lightweight distribution. Set up a virtual machine using that . Apr 30, 2016 · Decent UI for a lightweight desktop environment; Cons. Yeah, initially you spend quite some time configuring the desktop and making sure stuff works. A lightweight Linux distribution. It features a traditional desktop environment layout with a panel, a window manager, and various essential tools and applications. Members Online Any desktop on the Pi is way less resource intensive than a browser I would spend some time exploring the 'lite' browsers and decide if a web based solution is more efficient than QT etc. Out of the box, it features the beautiful Calamares installer. purely from a clean perspective GNOME may or may not have the edge here. I'm addition to that it is extremely lightweight. Thanks in advanced. However, I wouldn't mind sacrificing the desktop environment for something even simpler. It is completely compatible with the Arch repositories and the AUR, but features a custom repo for the base components of OBR. Then just remove/comment out the i3 bar from the config. Once installed it is of course larger, but you can resist the temptation to tack on very much cruft. Definitely you want the 32-bit OS since you have less than 4GB RAM, and you should unload unused modules and stop unused services. In the beginning it used the XForms toolkit to program the GUI What is the more lightweight desktop environment for debian yet stable? By stable I mean, you can run it confident of a good workflow experience, that means crashproofed, you know, a decent desktop environment to work on, simply, What is the most lightweight desktop environment? I want to run a Civ V Pitboss server on my physical server (which of course is headless). The physical memory required by these can be shared if two applications use the same library. That usually comes preconfigured with most of the stuff a lightweight DE has and is very lightweight. MATE is a fork of the GNOME 2 desktop environment by the MATE team. . The Ubuntu "mini-iso" network installer (available here) is only wait for it 77. Start with Debian 11 (bullseye) with no desktop environment As per u/Volitank instructions If you want plasma 5, before running the KDE installation, you need to "upgrade" from bullseye to "testing". One of the amazing things with most any linux distro is the vast variety and flexibility to add or remove what you want, to make it what you want. Is that also the case in NixOS? Xfce is a fast and lightweight open source desktop environment for unix-like systems like Linux and BSD. Apr 21, 2023 · MATE. Some deleted account said 4 months ago: Debian is what Ubuntu is based on and its default configuration tends to be quite a bit more lightweight than Ubuntu's, even with the same desktop environment. 24 Plasma edition once, but it was too slow. I just want a desktop environment that can take up My personal fav lightweight desktop (i. installing another desktop environment is simple though. Plus it's super lightweight and super fast. This subreddit is an attempt to form a community around the love of practical, cosy, and solid desktop experiences. So i had to roll back. This. Currently I'm using XFCE on LXDM, but I want to know if there's any lightweight desktop environment which runs on wayland. It might be overwhelming at first because you can do so much with it, but once you configure it and figure out what style you like you won’t change it anytime soon. A lightweight user environment (including the desktop environment) typically mean that in its resting state, your OS doesn't use many system resources. Gnome isn't lightweight, hyprland isn't a desktop environment, its a tiling window manager, currently there's no lightweight desktop environments that support wayland, you'll have to go X11, probably the 2 best options would be xfce or lxqt, it looks like lxqt will probably support wayland long before xfce will. E. Xfce is a fast and lightweight open source desktop environment for unix-like systems like Linux and BSD. It would seem as though wayland works much smoother on my computer so I would want to use that as my default. I would say dont use stuff like lubuntu or anything that comes with a DE. Thus an AFAIK Gnome, KDE and XFCE are the oldest desktops for Linux. A lot of the setups are too "riced-out" and unappealing for long-term desktop use. It's rolling release so you get pretty up-to-date packages. If you want to be lighterweight try using just a window manager. The most lightweight-yet-usable desktop distro is Void Linux, especially the musl version. As you're new to Linux, you want to balance a low resource footprint with something with a start menu XForms Common Environment v4. Budgie isn't bad if you're into desktop environments. without having to boot into another distro to try a different DE. Pantheon is a new lightweight, modular desktop environment primarily written in Vala and GTK+. I have been using LXQt for a little bit, however while it is extremely lightweight, it doesn't have many customizing options and doesn't look that good. It ships vanilla versions if I'm not mistaken, although, by default, it installs gnome. When it's done you'll boot straight into the command prompt. 6 64bit: 768 MB of RAM LXDE is no longer maintained, whereas LXQt is. Each one has it's own fans that will praise one and reject others. As for regular DE, nothing is quite close to being as lightweight as LXDE. It refers to the CPU and the number of cycles. Unfortunately, I can't find any desktop environment that has even a functional menu bar. I'm less familiar with some of the newer options. It's only the desktop (icons) that lag though, as the window manager fps remains stable during the desktop lag, and no unresponsive windows etc. There are lightweight systems like OpenBox, which are not a desktop environment, but just a window manager. If someone wanted a "lightweight" Linux distro, does the distro itself need to be "lightweight", or do you just need a "lightweight" desktop environment? Meganoob BE KIND I've been looking around on r/FindMeADistro and I see a lot of posts from people asking for a "lightweight distro" for their older computer hardware. Distro News While XFCE is probably one of the most MS-Windows-user-friendly desktop environments, I think Fluxbox can be user-friendly enough, although the departure from MS-Windows is more significant. Rendering all those useless icons and popups is very expensive. isn't it weird to credit TDE with most KDE apps? Do they really maintain all of them as Qt3 forks? To my knowledge, DDE and Pantheon are based off GNOME Shell, so expect similar resource use. Installing this package sets up the basic XFCE desktop. Of course Window Managers can be hard to customize at the beginning but if you learn more about this stuff you can have really nice setup. Also, there is more to the efficiency than sheer resource utilization, especially RAM, since most DE's will cache a bunch of data and functions to speed up operation, so while the memory fingerprint might seem rather hefty, performance usually is good (in my experience any computer above 4GiB of RAM Based on Windows 10 Pro or Enterprise, build 18305 or newer, Windows Sandbox is an isolated, temporary, desktop environment where you can run untrusted software without the fear of lasting impact to your PC. Members Online Package sizes < 1-10 MB, barely obligatory dependencies - it's of course far away from KDE or Gnome with their (optional, but often preinstalled by desktop users) tons of programs/packages, but basically you can pull almost any package from "real"/"full" desktop environments and use it like in KDE/Gnome/Mate/Xfce, and so on. Display server: Xorg will give you less trouble if all your monitors have the same refresh rate, otherwise use a few environmental variables or Wayland (which some DE’s such as KDE currently don’t work with NVIDIA on, and can be buggy). Posted by u/flickdudz - 311 votes and 18 comments I use GNOME, i really like the GNOME platform, they're are focusing pretty hard on the user and developer experience. I don't want widgets or animations. Even theming is not provided out of the box. The theming it uses for this desktop environment is called Cosmic. As to multimedia, that's nothing to do with the desktop environment - it'll run mplayer, VLC, totem, whatever just like anything else. But after spending this time (during which you learn an awful lot) you became incredibly efficient, since you yourself created all the shortcuts and rules by which the windows work. Reply reply Just because he said desktop, doesn't mean desktop environment, because then you're just talking gnome and kde and xfce, which is what he said he didn't want, and which leaves out a large number of smaller things like icewm and jwm and the boxes that are closer to window managers but can be used as effective desktop environments Regolith is a modern desktop environment designed to let you work faster by reducing unnecessary clutter and ceremony. I think LXQT or LXDE is going to be the best desktop environment for minimal resources. xfce4: This is the core package for the XFCE desktop environment, a lightweight and efficient desktop environment for Linux and UNIX-like operating systems. Run the installer to set up the distro with the desktop environment you want to try. This is the new cosmic desktop that everyone is hyped about. 3K subscribers in the Linuxers community. IMO GNOME is the most touchscreen-friendly desktop environment. Xfce. You can try KDE, Gnome, MATE, Xfce, etc. When I tried kde 3 years ago, I felt like there were settings all over the place and it felt clunky (my perspective). Reply reply Top 1% Rank by size I have 8GB of ram, and I dont want the DE to use much of that, so I prefer lighter desktop environments. Which is to say, you can use a window manager without a DE just fine. I like to have lightweight GUI, and free some RAM for more useful things, so I am using LXDE with Lubuntu. MATE is based on the now-discontinued GNOME 2 desktop environment. recommend diving into Arch at some point - even if just for fun. I can look at the processes running and at the programs installed on my system and know why each and everyone of them is there, what it is doing, and what possible alternatives there are. even if its heavier. I am planning to switch desktop environments as I switch from Lubuntu to Arch. TDE born as a fork of KDE, but now it is a fully independent project with its own development team. Unlike many other Linux distros, openSUSE actively supports multiple DEs in the same distro. Using gnome is good but not too resource friendly. iso for the distro and desktop environment that you want to try. However, XFCE can look pretty good as well you just have to theme and configure it how you want it to be. (Edit: Can be also useful if you usually have a desktop with plenty of monitoring stuff like ram or CPU usage. 9MB on a fresh install, before launching X, sitting at a bash prompt. ) Welcome to the official subreddit of the PC Master Race / PCMR! All PC-related content is welcome, including build help, tech support, and any doubt one might have about PC ownership. If you want/need to use an environment as lightweight as possible, I would keep in mind that how the system is built globally will yield results one way or the other. I am a new Linux user. There is no better, just different. I run dwm on an old computer and it’s fine for basic tasks but I also don’t have the time to spend so much effort configuring every little thing. Members Online The Lightweight Desktop Environment is the product of the merge between the LXDE-Qt and the Razor-qt projects: A lightweight, modular, blazing-fast and user-friendly desktop environment. A significant amount of memory consumed by your desktop environment and your applications is due to shared libraries. The settings are basically for LXDE itself, and for the cosmetic appearance of the desktop - nothing for printing, networking, power management, etc, so I guess that stuff will be tacked on. If you're willing to piecemeal your DE, then I'd try Awesome, IceWM, JWM, or maybe Rox-desktop. com The real answer is: NO Desktop Environment. It includes extra Budgie is a desktop environment designed with the modern user in mind, it focuses on simplicity and elegance. Wait, if all you need is a terminal environment, no graphics, yes, there are very lightweight Linux distributions. And what you are describing as stability is actually reliability. Some websites say KDE is ''extremely lightweight'', but is this true? I might be wrong, but wouldn't it still be good to have a lightweight OS for heavy applications if you're using limited hardware. So starting such games on that activity has no unwanted side-effects. That means, you have to configure a lot by yourself and that is tedious for a newcomer. Like, they consider it a "bug" if the computer doesn't already know which of the PDF readers they have installed is actually the one they want. It is worth considering, the more importance is given to to make things lighter for the hardware. I found this helpful to remove the "layer" of the display manager and have a bit more freedom and control. I'm not used to ArchLinux based distros Kind of a tangent, but I'd def. Tiling window manager are great for some work flows, but they also lack some very important, very basic functionality that desktop environments provide out of the box. As IntentionCritical says there might be more fruitful areas of attack in this regard. Once it clicks, in hindsight it seems easy to understand but the bottom line is that an Activities-based desktop will NEVER help achieve the "year of the linux desktop"; it's simply too complicated for average (and below average) users whereas the regular desktop metaphor presents far less problem. iso as the installation disc. OpenBSD provides three window-manager options as part of the default install: fvwm (the default, very configurable), twm (light but too austere for my tastes), and cwm (my favorite). whatever distro you get, install the server version (or whatever they call the minimal installtion), install just a window manager like openbox and a few essentials like a browser, then install minecraft and play. It is used in distributions like Xubuntu, Linux Mint, Manjaro, MX Linux, Debian, and FreeBSD. - Bodhi Linux have forked enlightenment to be more light than e19 -> moksha desktop The distinction only makes sense when talking about packages. org comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment Welcome to /r/Linux! This is a community for sharing news about Linux, interesting developments and press. Mostly it seems to just be people installing the whole application suite, not just the desktop environment, and then being annoyed that they have two application suites. Both DEs are very light on resources, actually, these are the most lightweight desktop environments in Linux. Almost all default configurations in modern distributions will be a disappointment, but you might have some luck with emulators for 90's platforms. Do a minimal install; in the installer don't select a desktop environment (and make sure to unselect "Debian Desktop Enviroment" too, if you don't you'll still get Gnome). could be as low as 300mb> of RAM used The Coming of KLyDE, a Lightweight KDE-based Desktop Environment blogs. ) Search programs from keyboard (Windows Key/Super and then type the name) Shortcut to Terminal Along with raspbian, I would recommend a really lightweight desktop environment such as icewm (if you like win95) or fluxbox for really barebones. Need a Lightweight Desktop Environment Im running an old pc, and want a Desktop Environment that ,ideally, uses less RAM and processing power. No graphical tool for the package manager though, afaik. I haven't really used a desktop in years. I've set the top panel's background to the same png as the window titlebar and enabled hiding titlebars on maximize, so maximized windows now seamlessly integrate into the top panel just like in Unity! Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now whats a lightweight desktop environment on arch . Performance is the same as windows, give or take. It is designed to be easy to use, highly configurable, and resource-friendly. Right after I do an install I usually install i3 or herbstluftwm. So Pop (which is based on Ubuntu) is currently using a desktop environment called GNOME. You can do so directly from your system by running sudo tasksel in a terminal, picking the new "tasks" you want (i. Im new to the world of DEs, and need help with this. Gnome can be relatively lean, and a WM relatively heavy, depending on which services are installed and active from the boot up; the same DE will be heavier in one distro and Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now A New Lightweight Desktop Environment Based On Qt ~30 minutes after talking about this desktop in The Lightweight Desktop Environment is the product of the merge between the LXDE-Qt and the Razor-qt projects: A lightweight, modular, blazing-fast and user-friendly desktop environment. But probably the best thing about KDE is the crazy fast release cycle and the continuous improvement in response to user feedbacks (which is clearly something some major desktop environments lack, you know what DE I'm referring to). but do try the others as well. Heavy system requirements and lack of customisation is huge turnoff. The entire server system was only 22Gb for the entire thing ( minus the data drive ) so yes. Members Online Posted by u/Munsterlandr - 1 vote and no comments I think the more sighnificant part would be the desktop environment. Keep in mind that what really matters is memory consumption of the desktop environment with your favorite applications loaded. There's no compiling or funky procedures to get another desktop environment to work. When I got my latest computer, an Asus G14 gaming laptop with 16GB of RAM and a 1TB SSD, I installed XFCE and then an Openbox setup. the new DE), letting it run, and then rebooting and selecting the new DE at the login prompt. With KDE the customisation is limitless, you can change every aspect of it and make it look exactly as you want it to look like. Then you can disable xfwm4 and xfdesktop from auto start and add i3. Best lightweight desktop environments /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers Hey. g. A term that is unfortunately used incorrectly far too often. Lightweight Desktop Environment for Gentoo . If you're running an 8 year old Celeron with 2 gigabytes of RAM, keeping the overhead from your user environment as low as possible will make a huge difference. Plasma allows me to create a "Gaming" activity with it's own set of desktop widgets/iconsnamely none. If you need something even more lightweight, you should go with standalone WMs like Openbox, i3 or dwm and tinker them manually to your liking. Fluxbox and Openbox are pretty good minimalistic window managers. A while ago I had accidentally upgraded it while the nextcloud it runs couldnt handle the newer php version. The user experience is pretty polished and well thought-out and with a great developer experience it makes it way easier to create new apps, apps. The reason lightweight desktop environments appeal to me, even though I've a nice PC, is that I can wrap my head around them. You use the windows key to navigate virtual desktops, search for applications, and even to navigate between different windows on your desktop reserving alt + tab to navigate between windows that are the 2 most recently viewed. However, there is one problem. With that said, you can just install a different window manager or desktop environment in your existing mint installation if you want to save some time. It's a window manager rather than a desktop environment, but after trying it I simply cannot go back to regular desktop environments like Gnome, KDE, or Cinnamon. Due to using runit instead of systemd and musl instead of glibc (optional), it's quite a bit lighter than Debian or Arch. for KDE `exec startx /usr/bin/startplasma-x11` or `exec startplasma-wayland`. Of all the lightweight DEs available, my personal favourites are KDE Plasma and XFCE. I've already tried the Kali version of XFCE and I didn't quite liked it! Is there any kind of alternative? Tried as best as I could to capture the look and feel and workflow of Unity on Xfce. Aug 24, 2023 · In this article, we will show you some of the Lightweight Desktop Environments that have attracted distributions to make them their default desktop environment. So my plan is to install a lightweight Linux distro and a simple desktop environment. I have a 11 year old machine with a 300 GB HDD and a 2 GB DDR3 RAM, and I have used XFCE and Cinnamon with Linux Mint before I switched to Lubuntu with LXQt. I haven't had a main computer with less than 16GB of RAM in at least 5 years. r/UnixPorn has inspired a lot of creativity in the *nix community. Lubuntu: 1 GB of RAM Kubuntu: 512 MB of RAM Ubuntu Desktop Edition: 4 GB of RAM Elementary OS: 4 GB of RAM Zorin OS Lite: 512 MB of RAM Xubuntu: 512 MB of RAM Ubuntu Mate: 1 GB of RAM Bodhi: 512 MB of RAM Linux Lite 5. You can also try sway, that tends to be slightly lighter than i3 but it only works on Wayland instead of Xorg which is still a little rough on the edges. Aha. Linux and FOSS fans. What are similar options for NixOS? What steps to follow? I heard some with similar minds don't use a desktop environment, but only a window manager (e. ultimately its better for you to go check a few videos showcasing both DE so you can get a rough Hey!! I've been using Kali Linux for quite sometime now and after trying out both Gnome and KDE for quite a few months now, I want to switch to a lightweight Desktop Environment, especially since I need to run couple of VMs simultaneously. And sometimes spectrwm or awesome wm But if a window manager is a little too daunting for ya and you want lightweight desktop then lxqt would be the one A more typical direction would be to use a well-supported distribution with a lightweight Desktop Environment. My options: gnome, kde, xfce, cinnamon, mate, lxde. A lightweight desktop environment is going to use less system resources which leaves more resources for actual applications. The Trinity Desktop Environment (TDE) is a complete lightweight software desktop environment created for Unix-like operating systems, intended for personal computer users preferring a conventional desktop model. If you have a spare usb drive or two AntiX might be worth trying, it comes with several super lightweight desktop environments to choose from at login and targets potatoes. If you're looking for tech support, /r/Linux4Noobs and /r/linuxquestions are friendly communities that can help you. Lightweight Distro has absolutely nothing to do with storage space nor RAM. org compiles a bunch of GNOME apps that follow the polish and design from the platform. Looking for some insight on Desktop Environments. Although it misses a few features and its development is slower than Cinnamon’s, MATE runs faster, uses fewer resources and is more stable than Cinnamon. Oct 30, 2024 · use the following search parameters to narrow your results: subreddit:subreddit find submissions in "subreddit" author:username find submissions by "username" site:example. Desktop environment: up to you, check out visuals and customisation etc. 2. I have had problems in the past with environments like XFCE because it had not offered fractional scaling and everything was too small for me, though I read a post about it getting fractional scaling recently. Xfce is one of the oldest desktop environments out there that is still rocking. There won't be anything more lightweight than that tbh For a DE, Gatesgamer33's suggestion of openbox (technically LXDE if you want the full DE and not just the WM) is the way to go. XFCE is lightweight, and it ships on the "Xubuntu" spin of Ubuntu. The term refers exclusively to the used CPU cycles. If you want a good lightweight desktop environment, I personally recommend XFCE. It's very much a "build your own" environment, but it lets you make a very clean, purpose-built install for anything from an embedded media player to home automation to a Minecraft server or large-scale shared web host. This is going to be my main setup. Oct 31, 2024 · When it comes to lightweight Linux distributions, “small” refers to an OS that consumes minimal system resources. I would recommend installing the desktop environment. I've been looking for Debian-based Linux distributions, but I'm looking for one that is as lightweight as possible. Good to hear that there are movements for efficiency inside these application communities. It was originally written for use with And many of our professors recommended that we should try out Linux OSs. May 18, 2021 · 5. Which would be a lighter and more uniformly themed desktop environment between KDE Plasma and Budgie? the file picker is a component completely unrelated to the file manager (at least in GTK based environments), while desktop icons are literally part of the file manager, so the categories are quite misleading. This could include the best lightweight Desktop Environments to use, what system settings to change, options to add to the bootloader, what to disable, etc. 16 is my favourite DE so far. I've heard of Puppy Linux, and I even tried out Damn Small Linux myself, which only consumed 19MB of RAM and 3% of CPU. This is probably a mess. it started back in the 90's as an open source clone of Common Desktop Environment (CDE), a very popular but closed source DE for UNIX systems. Anyone can create their own "desktop environment" by combining the programs they most prefer for managing windows, files, graphics, and systems. The GNU Network Object Model Environment v41 that I had installed a week ago also ran wonderfully. I got a low spec pc with a dual core processor and 2 gb ram. The lightest desktop environment is no desktop environment at all and just sticking to a window manager. If you really want a desktop environment, though, go with LXDE. LXQt is lightest Desktop Environment. Members Online Well, you don't really need a desktop environment if you're familiar with the command line, but on a server I would say the lighter, the better, so probably LXDE or something like that. e the one I used to use on netbooks) is enlightenment - E17 was lightweight, however e19 is more 'heavy'. Due to various limitations with GNOME, the pop os team decided to build their own desktop environment instead. It first started with only a file manager, PCManFM, but then evolved into more apps that comprise a full desktop environment. User interface may seem unappealing; Not much customizable; Available only on a few distributions (can be installed on your own manually) 7. intuitive to use once you get the hang of it. Here's what I could find for minimum RAM requirements among the more popular Ubuntu Distros. A few additional thoughts: a basic web browser would be pretty easy with WebKit, there is a nice multimedia layer in Qt 4, and Qt provides a lot of goodies like inotify integration for building a simple file manager. I recommend Fedora and you can install any desktop environment on it. Gut feel is that lite browsers such as Midori / Otter will still eat up memory and processor and not be as stable as QT. OBRevenge is a lightweight Arch Linux-based desktop operating system featuring a custom Openbox desktop environment. It's my father's computer, and he likes having icons on the desktop, but sadly hovering over the icons for some reason causes major lagging. ) MATE (a gnome 2 fork. Some look more modern than others, but it seems to me it's at a cost of demanding a bit more from hardware. I want a functioning desktop that is lightweight, stable and customisable. Something like apt install kde-plasma-desktop plasma-nm should be a good start for minimal Plasma desktop. So I have this built-in preference for lightweight options even though it's past time it died. Worked fine. So, for all you Custom Distro's with a particular niche in your DE, a thanks. If you're into more lightweight or "just-works"-stuff, I suggest Xfce + lightweight, duh + great customizability + modular approach, easy replacement - considered ugly by many but it depends on your taste and theme If you want something a bit more modern than that, pick Cinnamon + lightweight + more modern UI + Windows-like defaults I'm looking for a lightweight desktop environment that doesn't experience screen tearing. I use Windows too and I’m just better with a more Windows-like DE with an old school “start menu”. some desktops you can consider are xfce4 (Very lightweight, comes with lightdm which may not work, slIM is better. I decided to stop using GNOME and i moved to a more lightweight desktop on debian gnu/linux 12, which is kde and xfce and icewm. Now compare it to other Desktop Environments in terms of resources. These distros often run on very low RAM, use fewer CPU cycles, and take up minimal disk space, making them perfect for older laptops or computers with limited specifications. Reply reply If you need lightweight you could consider not using a desktop environment at all and just go standalone mode with whatever window manager you like. My favorite desktop environment is gnome because of how windows key centric it is. A desktop in general is the opposite of lightweight. When I said "desktop environment" I was speaking about the environment in the sense of it as an application suite. Arch doesn't even come close and it's harder to install than Void. Welcome to the vibrant community dedicated to all things Linux! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey into the open-source world, this subreddit is your go-to destination. I personally prefer KDE. Xfce is one of the most lightweight desktop environments out there. lxqt(qt): Bare bones DE. All of them, to be honest, will run very well on top of an Arch base. I like choice, but sometimes you can get lost in customization of a DE, especially KDE. As mentioned in the title, it is a lightweight desktop environment (300mo compressed size) that you can access from your web browser, I could make the image smaller with the alpine os but since I am more familiar with Debian-based distros I used Debian-slim image as the base. I can't watch a video or even just scroll through a reddit thread without horrible screen tearing in XFCE. The problem is, the server application, for whatever reason, only has a GUI. Just an FYI further to what others are suggesting: you do not need to reinstall Debian to choose a different DE. My usecases: Writing Docs and papers searching web for information lightweight programming, preferably vs-code (But I'm also used to in console programming with nano) In the other hand, in 2006 the Taiwanese programmer Hong Jen Yee (also known as PCMan) released the Lightweight X Desktop Environment: LXDE. Outside of the cosmos of apt-based distros, Void Linux is great. Depending on what you want to do, running shell only might be a decent choice. On my OrangePi Zero2 1GB, running Debian Bullseye (all packages whatever version is current in the bullseye repos), I get a RAM usage of 129. xorg itself is totally bloated. But if you want to go lower, you can try using just Window Manager like Openbox or i3-gaps. Despite all it's customization options, it's system resource usage is very similar to that of XFCE these days. If you want a more of a desktop environment with the benefits of i3, I would recommend using XFCE. Built on top of Ubuntu, GNOME, and i3, Regolith stands on a well-supported and consistent foundation. I use openbox on a touchscreen so I guess it all depends on how much work you want to do to get things working :) Since you've got brand new hardware I'm kinda leaning toward recommending Fedora - or, since I prefer dpkg-based distributions maybe Debian Testing or Unstable? How my desktop looks at times can help or hinder my function in work flow. Tried the K{Komplete} Desktop Environment v5. Yes, I consider KDE Plasma to be a lightweight DE. Copper Gnome(gtk): Well developed DE. is an open-source project to easily create lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application Consider switching to a lightweight distribution (meaning another Linux than PopOs), which are designed for very old hardware. Every desktop environment has a window manager. You can use something like fbterm to split your screen into multiple sections. Members Online KDE is a full desktop with all its bells and whistles. (2) Desktop environments. I fired up various 'light' desktop environments via xinit, and measured the amount of memory used while sitting at the empty desktop. The most stable and secure desktop environment (DE) is no desktop environment. xxjoctg ocmi ora zcwfzo sazbt jvrkawbj oivx zsrzefw ewzvsa arqv